February 25, 2018

Fleet of Three UFOs Caught In Front Of Moon In NASA Photo, Oct 2013, UFO Sighting News.

ufo near moon 2

ufo near moon smal

Date of discovery: October 2013
Location of discovery: Near Earths Moon
Source: http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/images/ISD/highres/AS09/AS09-23-3500.JPG
Mission: Apollo 9, 179 Nautical Miles above Earth, or 324km in orbit.
Camera: HB Hasselblad, 80mm,
Film: Kodac Ektachrome, Frame 23

UFOs that were over 2-3 km long have been seen and reported by pilots and other eyewitnesses, I myself have reported UFOs on the moons surface that were about 10km across in comparison with the nearby crater who’s diameter is known.

Here again are three UFOs, long and giant in size flying past the moon and recorded by none other than NASA! Its a glitch, a scratch, a cheap lens on your scope…sorry boys, NASA buys only the best quality and highest performance parts for its observations, but thank you for playing. SCW

Published on Oct 25, 2013

Photo taken by a crewmember of Apollo 9 mission while in flight.Image Link – http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/images/…
Streetcap1 is on Facebook – http://www.facebook.com/pages/Streetc…

ufo near moon

ufo near moon3

HEMP FOR AMERICA 2: The Farm Bill Died, But Hemp May Live On – Americans Speak Out!

Hemp has been used for it’s fibers and medicinal purposes for over 12,000 years, including in early America till the 1920’s.
And now Congress says we ‘might’ study it? Please!

hemp Hanflabyrinth_Berlin_2009_-_40

The House just got a little bit more hemp-friendly. (Creative Commons Attribution License)

The House is still shell-shocked from the unexpected failure of the Farm Bill last week–the kind of legislation that usually passes smoothly, but in our era of dysfunction, fell victim to a poison pill. As Brad notes, the options going forward include starting over entirely, or even going back to rules written in 1949.

There are a lot of big reasons to be troubled about this. But at least one thing happened during the writing of the final bill that should be cause for celebration: The House actually accepted an amendment allowing research on industrial hemp.

Industrial hemp, defined as a particular strain of cannabis with very low levels of THC, is produced in some 30 countries for use in a wide variety of fiber and textile products. But even though nine states have legalized its cultivation, U.S. law still treats it the same as marijuana, which means the Drug Enforcement Administration could throw you in jail for growing it. So the United States has been importing more and more hemp over the years from places like China and Canada–about $11.5 million worth in 2011, according to a March report, with a “highly dedicated and growing demand base.”

That didn’t used to be the case. The federal government encouraged the cultivation of hemp fiber during World War II, and it only fell out of favor as anti-drug sentiment rose, before being effectively banned in 1970. Now, it’s even illegal to grow the plant for research purposes without explicit permission from the DEA–which is where Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) came in.

Research is important. Without partnering with academic agronomists, it’s hard for farmers to know exactly how to grow an entirely new crop in a given region, and what kinds of yields they can expect. Earlier this year, Colorado State University was considering starting a research program on industrial hemp, but feared losing federal funding because of it. Polis tried to assure the school’s Board of Governors that everything would be okay, and encouraged them to seek a waiver from the DEA, which had granted one to the University of Hawaii back in 1999 (and three more since). But the Board wanted some certainty, so Polis introduced an amendment to the farm bill that would legalize cultivation in colleges and universities for research purposes.

Miraculously, despite last-minute lobbying against it from the DEA, the amendment passed by a vote of 225-200. In light of repeated failures of bills that would legalize industrial hemp production more broadly–one fizzled as an amendment to the Senate farm bill, and a House proposal has been moldering in a subcommittee since April–that’s the most significant sign of progress on the federal level that hemp advocates have ever seen.

It might have a second life sooner than the rest of the House Farm Bill. Polis wants to take that sign of goodwill and tack it on to “any other bill that is germane,” such as Agriculture appropriations, or on its own as a standalone bill. “When you have a Congressional majority on any issue, there are a variety of ways you can move forward,” Polis says.

After that’s taken care of–along with active support from the likes of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)–a law respecting states’ desires to allow hemp production within their own borders looks a little less outlandish.

[ SOURCE: washingtonpost.com ]




What about the research that the University of Mississippi has been doing http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/health/23conv.ht… taxpayer dollars…


Just a little research shows that William Randolph Hearst lobbied Congress to make cannabis illegal because it was used for paper (high quality a low cost, environmentally superior) and he wanted to increase the demand for wood pulp because he owned timber. He required his newspapers to call it marijuana (which looked more foreign than the Mexican slang term for smoked substances, marihuana and made it easier to demonize Mexicans in the propaganda). Congress worked on the bill in secret for a couple years before the AMA had a clue that there was a move to make illegal a substance that had been prescribed for millennia. A 2010 Lancet report shows alcohol and tobacco are much more harmful (both to the user and society) than cannabis. Our paper money has always been made from it, as it’s much more durable. During WWII our government taught farmers how to grow it because our foreign sources of hemp were not available. http://relegalize.info/library/hemp-for-victory.sh…


Save billions and collect a lot of tax money by legalizing the herb across country


“You can’t smoke rope, not even in Reefer Madness.”


As they rightfully should have. Hate for the poor, greed, and selfishness seem to be growing American mental illnesses.

“The farm bill failed because Democràts refused to accept cuts to the program’s categorical eligibility which allows trust fund babies receive food stamps while hiding their assets.”

I dunno, but it seems like good enough reason to abolish the USDA to me.

I mean, seriously, if that’s the kind of thing you’re arguing over, the pooch is already so screwed that it will never walk again.


I’m sorry, but it seems like getting rid of the agency responsible for food safety inspections just because someone somewhere might be taking advantage of SNAP seems to be a gross overreaction.


Ah, yes, because those farmers, processors, and restaurateurs do so love to poison their customers. It’s the tried and true way to build a business.

The USDA and the FDA are as corrupt and incompetent as, say, the IRS or the U.S. Department of State, and to believe that they are protecting the food supply is ludicrous.


“U.S. law still treats [hemp] the same as marijuana”

The worst thing is, it’s typical of the entire behemoth. In its triteness, it tells you everything you need to know about the disgrace that is our festering government.


Except it was the American public which demanded it be outlawed. The people here seem to have a fear of everything.


“Except it was the American public which demanded it be outlawed.”

Fatuous, on its face. And no argument against the idiocy of it, irrespective.


It was in 1937 marijuana was made illegal based on accusations by Anslinger, etc. that it caused white women to listen to jazz and date black men, etc. Not sure laws based on old racist premises need to be pushed as American public opinion today unless someone’s still that racist.

Thoeni has it right. “Reefer madness” got our parents (and their parents) terrified of weed so the begged the government to do something. Now they are afraid of the Government. Not fatuous at all (If it were you might have made some effort to prove it.)


–*”Reefer madness” got our parents (and their parents) terrified of weed*–

Nonsense. Virtually no one saw the movie between the time it was made in 1936 until it was rediscovered for the joke it was in the 70s. And anyone who was influenced by that nonsense probably had a number of mental defects.


Not to mention the health benefits of hemp seeds and hemp oil which contain all 20 amino acids our bodies use to produce protein. In addition, hemp seeds and oil are one of the few vegetable sources of omega 3 fatty acids which are crucial in maintaining proper Ph levels in the body. Hemp may also be an important source of bio fuels in the future.


ever had hemp probiotics…………?


Plus the fact is the strain that’s called marijuana has extensive health benefits for many, and some people even would be dead if they didn’t take it.


What fools we have running this country now…in WW2 we ran our military trucks on hemp seed oil…hemp produces 10 tons of fiber on one acre of marginal land that could be burnt in coal fired power plants with minimal environmental impact…or used as fiber board or insulation…….BUT…the lumber industry lobbied against it as the fiber was being made into plywood…cutting into the lumber industries profits…hemp oil was already perfected…now we spend billions on green algae research…and billions more at 16 dollars a gallon for green algae fuel for our military at obozos demand…or executive order# 9,543,879 ….


Hemp. Oil was already proven in ww2….



Billion Dollar Crop: The history and advantages of hemp as an industrial fiber

This surprising video explains the environmental interest in the non-drug variety of hemp as a versatile industrial fiber, and documents the history of its prohibition.

Backed by years of worldwide research, BILLION DOLLAR CROP exposes the political and industrial manipulations, which outlawed one of the most valued plants in history.

Hemp once provided the paper on which US banknotes were printed, the cloth for the original Levi jeans, as well as the sails and rigging of ships. During World War II it was of such strategic importance that the US Government encouraged farmers to convert to hemp cultivation.

BILLION DOLLAR CROP shows how the recently developed, non-drug variety of hemp is being researched and cultivated internationally because of the plant’s versatile qualities and environmental friendliness. This program takes the audience on a world tour from Australia to the United Kingdom, and from The Netherlands to France and the US. It illustrates how hemp is being cultivated as an industrial fiber for use as an alternative to wood for paper production, to cotton for clothes, and to plywood for construction. We all benefit, especially our forests and topsoil.

Directed by Barbara Ann Chobocky
Produced with Michael Cordell and Jeffrey Bruer



Reefer Madness (1936) – Colorized and Restored Version

The propaganda, turned, cult-movie about Marijuanausage. Notice the colorful postmillenium editing. Also great acting and cutting. A great film about pre-first world war propaganda in America

Reefer Madness is an exploitation film portraying the tragic events that ensue when high school students are lured by pushers to try “marihuana”: a hit and run accident, manslaughter, suicide, attempted rape, and madness.

It was originally financed by a church group and made under the title Tell Your Children. The film was intended to be shown to parents as a morality tale attempting to teach them about the dangers of cannabis use. Soon after being shot, however, the film was purchased by producer Dwain Esper, who re-cut the film for distribution on the exploitation film circuit.


This is a Great article/post on the subject by Santa Cruz: Legalize Hemp: The Case for Reviving America’s First Crop



Click Here for LEGAL Hawiian Gold BUDS! 100% Legal Herbal Smokes Shipping WORLDWIDE legal herbal buds from.

GOOGLE HELL!: Google To Put User Photos, Comments In Online Ads “Who The Hell Does Google Think They Are?!” Americans Speak Out


censorship2 internet

Google has made a fortune selling ads. Now it’s trying to put its hundreds of millions of users to work as company pitchmen, using the profiles, pictures and recommendations of ordinary people to endorse products and services across the Web.

After the policy takes effect Nov. 11, users who review a video on YouTube or a restaurant on Zagat.com could see their name, photo and comments show up in ads on any of the 2 million Web sites that are part of the company’s display advertising network.

The controversial practice, announced Friday by Google, is part of an emerging trend on the Internet. Advertisers believe that consumers place enormous value on product endorsements that come from a friend or family member, and growing numbers of Web companies are trying to capture that social advertising in a systematic way.

But critics say tactics that further exploit the data people leave online amount to a bait-and-switch. People signed up for Google’s services because they were free and convenient. They probably never thought their words and identities would be put in front of strangers to sell a product.

Users who casually endorse a product or song on Facebook or Google “may be exposed to unwanted, and possibly misunderstood, implications,” said Eric Goldman, a professor of Internet law at Santa Clara University law school.

Google said the launch of “shared endorsements” will help consumers make better choices. “We want to give you — and your friends and connections — the most useful information. Recommendations from people you know can really help,” the company wrote in its announcement.

It added that users can opt out of the ads and that it will automatically exclude anyone under the age of 18.

The announcement follows a similar advertising feature by Facebook called “sponsored stories,” which turns a recommendation made through the social network’s “like” button into an advertising endorsement on a friend’s Facebook page. The company has said its users cannot opt out of the practice. About 1.2 billion people are on Facebook.

Last month, the Federal Trade Commission said it would review whether Facebook’s push into sponsored stories violated the company’s 2011 privacy settlement with the federal government. That agreement required Facebook to give adequate notice of changes in privacy policies and to make sure users aren’t misled about how their data is being used.

Due to the government shutdown, the FTC said it could not respond to a question on whether its investigators would also examine Google’s new advertising practice.

Google said its new advertising policy would apply only to the 390 million people who have signed up for Google Plus, the company’s social network. The company can also draw on endorsements made with Google’s +1 button, which is similar to Facebook’s “like” button and appears on sites across the Web.

A user who wants to limit the reach of his or her advertising endorsements could adjust settings so that a positive review for, say, a car is shared only with a small circle of friends on Google Plus, the company said.

Some privacy experts commended the way Google is rolling out the feature by giving users a month’s notice of the changes and options to decline.

“Some people may like the fact that their reviews will be promoted and more influential. Others have a pretty easy way to opt out,” said Jules Polonetsky, executive director of the Future of Privacy Forum.

In May 2012, Google agreed to a $22.5 million FTC fine for misrepresenting its tracking practices on the Safari browser used on Apple devices. The settlement included continued supervision of the firm’s disclosures about how it handles users’ data.

Google said it will display the latest change in its privacy policy on its main home page, through Google Plus notifications and in other prominent places.

Still, some privacy advocates remained skeptical of the search giant.

“This move by Google reflects the growing and unchecked expansion of online data collection by the industry,” said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy.

Hayley Tsukayama contributed to this report.

By Cecilia Kang, Published: October 11



Internet rule #1 — If you’re not paying for the “product” — YOU are the product…


Just be something your not, wake up tomorrow morning & your gmail account will all sorts of advertisements linked to the perceived profile, now amgine doing this by a factor of billion, it would be price”less” or useless, I would love to see the day when this happens.


Google has become evil!

That’s why I have switched to a competitor for 90% of my searches.

Duck Duck Go (dot) Com is good for most searches, and if you don’t find what you are looking for, you just click once to convert it into a google search.

PLEASE take one moment right now to check out Duck Duck Go (dot) Com, and click on where it says “search anonymously”.

So what do you think…..?

I do give Google credit for Google Maps, which I believe are the best.

But I avoid putting in the street number, or exact street number if I can – same policy with mapquest.

Is it anybody’s business where you are going? Does Google need to know that you are going to a psychologist, or a strip joint, or an AA meeting, or a marriage counselor, or the food bank, or a physical therapist, or a bankruptcy lawyer, or a new church, or a chiropractor, or a support group, or a fortune teller, or the IRS office etc. etc. ?

Of course NOT!!!

If you liked Duck Duck Go, “you may also like Hushmail”.

The only way companies will consider doing the right thing is, if they start to loose market share, or revenue.


LOL. Just wait until the (soon-to-be-ex) wife sees those “endorsement” ads for the jewlery and the 5-star resort stay that she never remember getting…


Wait until Google/Chrome starts outing every anonymous comment or email. That can only be Phase 2 in the FBing of America. Ouch, that is going to leave a mark. Who can we thank in advance for that round of suffering?


We need a completely new internet. We’ve let this one get completely out of hand. Internet 2 should be free of cookies, porn, popups, and “friends.” It has to be annoynmous above all.


This is what happens when an entity gets this huge and globally dominant…they start to take charge of their users. And unless there’s a big, legal pushback of some kind, users and/or customers have few alternative options so end up having to live with it or bailing completely. I’m starting to think about the latter option, but one wonders what options would exist for all the online services we’ve all become used to in this internet saturated global society. Bottom line is, I’m betting most everyone will be stuck with whatever the huge entities want to do with us and our info. This is getting downright scary!


This is totally wrong. Google and FB try to play it off like wow such a great thing, real people endorsing products. This is why my real name and image is no where on the net. You cannot take peoples identites and photos and use them how YOU see fit Google. You are totally evil and I do not use you for a search engine anymore and I will never use Google plus and other things you are forcing on people and connecting everything together. Google sucks.


Go here, turn if off: https://plus.google.com/settings/endorsements


I really don’t see any incentive given to the user to NOT opt out


This is the biggest bunch of crap that I have seen a company do without approval from the person. Just because I use there service doesn’t mean they should be able to use me in there advertising,


It is kinda sweet… when you are a nobody, nobody cares, but if a nobody becomes a somebody, their real unmolested opinion will matter more than others.


If you frequent YouTube and are registered there under a “nickname”, while trying to leave a comment you likely will be harassed with regularity by pop-ups almost insisting that you change your nickname to your real name. This began happening several months ago. Now we know why.


Just a few thoughts:

I remember Lars Ulrich (“drummer” for Metallica) threw a tantrum about Naspster, is essence that Napster was infringing upon their (intellectual) property. He had valid points, mind you, but handled it poorly without really considering ALL the consequences; as a result DMCA, SOPA and PIPA are a few examples.


With SCOTUS, in their unusual behavior, placating to corporations Pinocchio-complex entitling them with Rights otherwise reserved exclusively for self-evident persons, it would appear that this ‘person’ named Google is well…

what is the Law…

I know there is one, historically significant too…

It says something like involuntary servitude and it’s really not acceptable in society. Then there is this other Law, it mentions ‘effects’, now common sense would dictate, in contemporary times, that personal data et al can be defined as the same as effects.

Now, with the SCOTUS Ruling on corporate personhood, would that mean that my birth and anyone else for that matter, that any assembled data, partically have market value, is my IP, copyrighted material (Birth Certificate). I can charge for this, certianly negociate terms for its use.

It’s cute when companies think that their TOS, EULA etc supersedes Law; it’s pathetic when government allows it to happen. But hey if these imperative Laws don’t exist anymore; let the wild west free market reign come what may and when in Rome do as the Roman do, so goes the phrase.

I have so many cool ideas that I can use Google, Facebook, Apple Microsoft ‘faces’ on so on and so forth.


There was a time when people would vote for a politician just because they met him in person. but not anymore , why ? Because Politicians abused the heck out of it. And now everyone knows it’s just a campaign trick.

These false ads are the same. They will be ignored by everyone. And advertising only to your close circle of friends is the death knell for them. Hey bob , so you really like that brand of soap ? Huh ? What are you talking about ? I never heard of that stuff I just buy what’s cheapest or on sale. Oh ..well ,nevermind.


“Truely Ilove this brand of beer”
insert my latest profile pic , which has me throwing up in the street.
Ah yes, computerized systems and artificial stupidity should not be associated with the human race.


As much as I detest Google’s actions, they can do it. Social media is just that “social.” We abandoned privacy long ago.


This is the part where governments step in and say “No You Can’t Do that, and we don’t care if you strong armed your users into agreeing”


“Celebrities” fight bitter court battles to protect their right to own their own image and words. Yet Google now believes it’s acceptable to purloin its users’ images and words for the company’s own profit? Really?! I didn’t know about this before, but just disabled this unwanted feature on my Google account. They will find that as fast as their fortunes rose, they can come crashing down just as quickly and with a loud thud. As the saying goes, “The bigger they are, the harder they fall.” Stop assuming people don’t value their private conversations with friends just because they are conducted online.


The default – at least for now – seems to be “OFF”
This will later change to “ON”
And later still change to “OPTION MISSING-YOU HAVE NO CHOICE”


When this happens, my gmail account and my Facebook page are disappearing. Maybe Google and the NSA are really the same!!!!


Google and Facebook (and every USA based corperation) are required by law to hand over all data they collect to the USA Government. (The whole NSA / PRISM thing that exploded this summer…where have you been sleeping the last six months ? )


No they are not. At minimum, the government has to provide a National Security Letter. Developers at Google were quite upset at the NSA/PRISM flap this summer, and are doing everything they can to resist such requests, and to make snooping as difficult as possible.


They will not have a real picture from me. Just a name.


I opted out of both Google and Face Book because of their intrusive privacy changes. It is best to remove your children and their pictures from any sight possible before they trample your children’s future privacy. Face Book now has the right to legally sift your private phone contacts and use them as (people you may know) connection information.

We are too immature to use the technology we now have the ability to create and this is always a recipe for a crushing disaster.


I tried deleting a Gmail account and had to provide a forwarding email address, so I just keep Gmail as a throwaway account. It really sucks with tons of spam.


I have been using Gmail for about 4 years, and I almost never receive any spam, perhaps once a month something slips through, I mark it, and Google updates their filtering. I also use (free) ad blocking software to suppress Gmail ads. Of all the email systems I have used over the past 30 years, Gmail is, by far, the best.


Resist. Just don’t ever review anything. Kill their “Golden Goose”.


At last, “full faith and credit” of on line reviews.


People signed up for Google’s services because they were free and convenient. They probably never thought <<<< Key words. "never thought". * Whatever happened to the laws in this country that make it illegal for someone to appropriate one's identity or image for commercial money-making purposes without a person's explicit permission? Those laws should be just as valid for Internet use as for other media. What's the difference and why aren't those laws being enforced? * Welcome to Mr. Obama’s transparency laws. As he said he wanted to make the government transparent, he meant he was aiming to make the public transparent because as we know, public information does not need a court order to investigate and snoop. This will take the step of asking the courts for permission to sift internet information away from the NSA. In short terms, just like Russia, privacy is not in the best interest of the common good of the nation. Welcome to Communism! And you didn’t even know it was transferring. * Oh, get off it. Mr. Obama is not the cause of everything you disdain, even if you and your lot seem to think he is the boogeyman who "explains it all" where it comes to justifying your paranoia. * Whatever happened to those days? YOU signed them away. YOU agreed to the terms of using their social media. YOU signed away your privacy, because your need for social media was greater than your need to understand to what it was you were agreeing. YOU made it happen, so don't point a finger at anyone but your uninformed self... * Apparently neither of you remember when the internet was nothing more than a phone call over the phone lines. Privacy was treated as a phone call concerning privacy laws. You seem to believe that this intrusive information gathering has been around as long as the internet its self. When I signed on for a Google account, sharing information that was considered private, was not an issue. They could gather the information but assured the account holder that it would not be distributed for profit. No! you kids are too young to remember reading these End User rules. I can assure you that they were there. And now they are moving away from those ethical obligations and this is the reason they must inform you of this change in security. Once again for you kids to understand, I do not blame Mr. Obama for everything. I do on the other hand blame him for continuing what was already bad, created out of the Patriot Act even worse by not showing restraint. Mr. Obama is no better that Mr. Bush when it comes to incompetence and a lack of concern for public privacy. * Only last week Facebook was moderately inconvenienced when it was found that the image of a dead teenager who had killed herself in Canada was now promoting a dating site. * So much for commenting or uploading anything to a Google property. * Seig Heil to google and their goose stepping acquiescence with the federal government. So much for 'doing no evil'. We all know they're lying. What adds insult to injury is they (google) receive our own hard earned federal tax dollars to hand over user info to the government. Tax payers are paying to be spied upon and the American sheeple do nothing. * Just wait until the algorithm glitches and the bot that searches comment fields captures a DEROGATORY remark cabout a product. The generated ad will say: Mr. Jones had this to say about our wonderful resaurant "That is the worst tasting crap a$$ food I've ever tasted!". So as you can see if this one patron loved the food this much, I'm sure you will too! * My Google photo is a picture of a Concord stage coach built for Wells Fargo & Co. I sure Wells Fargo & Co would love the free advertising. Idiots... * This isn't how you get people to use google+ You shouldn't force people to create google+ profiles either just to comment or upload videos to youtube. Google privacy invasion continues. In todays world if you want to be on a platform that has any popularity, you have to bend over and grab the ankles. Money is the name of the game. And everyone is maximizing income. Who the !@#$ care about happiness or goodwill!??? * will they publish the fact that i don't like their new policy? * The simple solution is to not review any videos on YouTube nor restaurants on Zagat ... * "Can I write a raving review exposing what a thief of content, intellectual property, and influence Google really is?" * I guess I will no longer be commenting on restaurants, movies or anything else for that matter again. Signing off, AverageJoe * Leave only negative reviews. No one will want to advertise those... * Time to change your avatar to something that they won't want to associate with the product. * You've been "Scroogled". * It all depends on how you define "evil". * Ehhh ... [he shrugs]. I don't see any major issues here (a few minor ones). You don't have to use the Google service(s), you don't have to post product reviews, you don't have to use your real photo (I don't on Facebook), and even if you do ALL of those things, you can still opt out of this feature. Opt in would be a better protection of privacy, but few businesses use that approach, for good reason. It is no more an invasion of privacy than someone quoting your letter to the editor, or this comment, except of course you don't endorse products in letters to the editor (NOTE: this comment cannot be construed as a favorable review of Google ) . A general rule of thumb is: if you don't want it public, don't say/put it on the internet. Like this comment, which I am typing on a Washington Post page which is displaying an ad for a brand of oatmeal I did a Google search on a few weeks ago (and have been seeing ads for ever since) - apparently the Post also subscribes to Google's commercial services. A final comment: Google is a really valuable service for many of us, which is free (like a lot of other things on the internet). It isn't cheap to run massive server farms, let alone all the other infrastructure needed. Google is not taxpayer funded or subsidized. How exactly is Google supposed to stay in business? * How are you supposed to keep your stock price rising at 872 USD? Like · "Opt-Out" is the new dirtiest phrase in my opinion. Making it so without our "Opting-In" to begin with is playing dirty pool and makes me want to dump them from my online activities. What a stupid move on their part! * As long as the default is "don't use anything of mine unless I tell you I can and you pay me for it", sure. Oh, that's not going to be the default? Then Hell no!!! * And here I thought that people got paid when they endorsed products! * And the worst endorsement is to Viagra or similar drug ads. You know why. * If a person endorses Obamacare ad, half of the country will become his enemy and everyone knows his face. * “We want to give you — and your friends and connections — the most useful information." No, what Google really means to say is "we own you, and we will exploit you in any way that makes money for us." Certainly Google is entitled to make a profit, but not when it misleads its users. * Scenario in the year 2030: Child to Mother: Mom, what's "privacy" mean? Mother to Child: Honey, I have no idea. Just eat your cereal... * Just eat your cereal... After all, your photo is on the box! * It's probably time to stop using google and gmail and others who care little about their users. It was fun for a while you guys and you my think you rule the world. Well, you don't rule my world. * Can we finally stop pretending that people who don't use social media regularly are strange? People act like if you don't have a facebook account something is wrong with you (or are just angry they can't stalk you). * Internet rule 1 — If you're not paying for the "product" — YOU are the product... * Just be something your not, wake up tomorrow morning & your gmail account will all sorts of advertisements linked to the perceived profile, now amgine doing this by a factor of billion, it would be price"less" or useless, I would love to see the day when this happens. * Google has become evil! That's why I have switched to a competitor for 90% of my searches. Duck Duck Go (dot) Com is good for most searches, and if you don't find what you are looking for, you just click once to convert it into a google search. PLEASE take one moment right now to check out Duck Duck Go (dot) Com, and click on where it says "search anonymously". So what do you think.....? I do give Google credit for Google Maps, which I believe are the best. But I avoid putting in the street number, or exact street number if I can - same policy with mapquest. Is it anybody's business where you are going? Does Google need to know that you are going to a psychologist, or a strip joint, or an AA meeting, or a marriage counselor, or the food bank, or a physical therapist, or a bankruptcy lawyer, or a new church, or a chiropractor, or a support group, or a fortune teller, or the IRS office etc. etc. ? Of course NOT!!! If you liked Duck Duck Go, "you may also like Hushmail". The only way companies will consider doing the right thing is, if they start to loose market share, or revenue. SOURCE: [ washingtonpost.com/business/technology/ ]


Google is Evil? According to Joseph Farah

In the book Stop the Presses!, Joseph Farah calls Google evil. He gives a very detailed description of why he believes Google is evil and has tried to pursue his views through many sources. Farah discusses some of his main topics, including Google’s deal with China and banner ads. For more details from Kara Ratliff, keep watching WebProNews.



[ GOOGLE IS D.A.R.P.A. – Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Head Of DARPA Moves To Google ]

google cia nsa


There is actually Zero controversy upon this subject.

Anyone can trace the Rise of all Western religions from Egypt, which actually came from Babylon/Sumeria where “The Gods walked among the people”.

The very word Israel is actually based upon IS=ISIS/ISHTAR RA=AMON/AMEN RA EL=EL SATURN (Saturday=Saturn’s Day)=The Sabbath
EL is actually different and far more powerful than these False Alien Gods who conquered and control this world today.
EL is as far above them as they are above us, technically.

I never refer to Israel as Israel. I always refer to them as the Children of Isis, Ra and El. The Children of Is-Ra-El.

All Religions today are controlled by High Ranking Freemasons. FAMOUS FREEMASONS Include: Billy Graham, Jesse Jackson, Oral Roberts, Louis Farrakhan, Dalai Lama. All 32nd to 33rd Degree Freemasons.

Free Masonry is completely Jewish right? Wrong. All Free Masonry dates directly back to Egypt and Sumeria(Babylon).
It Predates the Children of Is-Ra-El leaving (Kicked Out) Egypt. Back then, they were called the HBRN, later Hebrews.

They change names as well as history all the time to hide their trail. This is easy when you control all Media, Communication and all Education.

In short, all religions are controlled by Free Masons, The Enlightened Ones, The Illuminati, the whatever name they go by these days, it all dates back to Sumeria, Babylon and Egypt. We even have Egyptian Pyramids on some of our American Money. Ever wonder why? Possibly not.


Religion is a tool. It’s used to both condition and control Humanity/Humans. It’s used to turn humans into easily controllable living robots, slaves.

Religion and God Mythology were created after the last group of Humans began to rebel and think bad thoughts toward the Aliens who controlled them and worked them like…slaves. They weren’t considered Gods yet. Just different and far more powerful.

Fear and Power weren’t enough to scare these earlier humans into complete submission. The Aliens then tried Starvation and Drought. They used Weather as a weapon. Sound familiar?

But this didn’t work either. But they did kill thousands of Humans and Destroy alot of land. Sound Familiar?

By this time the Humans were completely fed up and tired of these Alien meddlers. They constantly complained about them.

The Aliens, lived on a high mountain, separated from the rest of the Human Scum. But the thoughts of the Humans reached them even there. It was a constant barrage of hate.

the Alien Answer: The Flood. The Deluge.

They caused a giant Flood and killed off most of the Humans. Those who remained were very easy to control, condition and adjust their DNA and Genomes of them and their children.

When Human numbers had replenished, they used Religion, which they had taught to the children of the Flood survivors, and War to control this batch of humans. It’s easy to get Religious People to kill others of a different religion. Too easy.

And this is where we are today.

They still use Religion as their number one control method of humans. Religion and War go Hand in Hand.

This Post is unfinished; To be Updated Later…

But it can all be found HERE:


“A picture is worth a thousand words. The following Pictorial/Post, speaks for itself. Religion and UFO’s go way back, hand in hand”

[ FAMOUS FREEMASONS: Billy Graham, Jesse Jackson, Oral Roberts, Louis Farrakhan, Dalai Lama ]

[ THE LOST BOOK OF ENKI: Memoirs and Prophecies of an Extraterrestrial God (Ancient Astronaut) – Pre-Babylon, Pre-Sumeria, Pre-Humanity “The Origin Of Modern Man” ]

The Above “Wood Carving” depiction is of a Major Battle between Aerial Vehicles. A “large Black Spear Shaped Ship” shows up and
easily Defeats all the other vehicles. So the story goes 🙂

[ XAXOR UFO’s in Old Art ]

[ UFO ArtWork.com ]


Ancient Gods or Ancient Aliens ??

Theologian and author Patrick Cooke discussed how his research counters Erich von Daniken’s notion that aliens have been mistaken for gods. Cooke contends that gods have been mistaken for aliens. Powerful gods or “Elohiym” traveled to Earth in spacecraft or UFOs; also associated with these vehicles were the “Malak,” angels who serve the gods, he said.

In the Bible, UFOs are depicted as clouds, transporting angels and gods. They are able to descend and ascend, hover, move rapidly and generally behave in ways that seem contrary to natural laws, Cooke stated. These craft could be the same as the UFOs that are sighted in the modern era, he suggested. Biblical figures such as Elijah, Moses and Enoch all experienced “divine abductions” which may relate to current reports of alien encounters.

He also touched on other aspects of the Bible that seemingly portray paranormal activity, including cryptozoological creatures (see below), ghosts, and prophecy. In a verse written by David, his description of the afterlife– “and we fly away” echoes that of near-death experiencers, Cooke noted.


Patrick Cooke, is the editor and author of The Bible UFO Connection. He is an independent researcher residing in Berkeley, California. He is an author, publisher, eschatologist, an autonomous theologian, and is recognized by the Religion Newswriters Association as a nontraditional scholar. His work is not associated with any religious organization or movement. He is the author of The Greatest Deception, The Doctrines of Men, and The Real Apocrypha, and has produced the videos Spirits in the Sky and UFOs – The Flying Gods.

Some writers have proposed that intelligent extraterrestrial beings have visited Earth in antiquity or prehistory and made contact with humans. Such visitors are called ancient astronauts or ancient aliens. Proponents suggest that this contact influenced the development of human cultures, technologies and religions. A common variant of the idea is that deities from most, if not all, religions are actually extraterrestrials, and their advanced technologies were wrongly understood by primitive men as evidence of their divine status.

These proposals have been popularized, particularly in the latter half of the 20th century, by writers such as Erich von Däniken, Giorgio A. Tsoukalos, Zecharia Sitchin, Robert K. G. Temple, David Icke and Peter Kolosimo, but the idea that ancient astronauts actually existed is not taken seriously by most academics, and has received little or no credible attention in peer reviewed studies. Ancient astronauts have been widely used as a plot device in science fiction.

The television series Ancient Aliens on the History channel features the main proponents in the ancient astronaut theory, and includes interviews with Giorgio A. Tsoukalos, David Childress, Erich von Däniken, Steven Greer and Nick Pope.

Von Däniken claims that ancient art and iconography throughout the world illustrates air and space vehicles, non-human but intelligent creatures, ancient astronauts, and artifacts of an anachronistically advanced technology. Von Däniken also claims that geographically separated historical cultures share artistic themes, which he argues imply a common origin. One such example is von Däniken’s interpretation of the sarcophagus lid recovered from the tomb of the Classic-era Maya ruler of Palenque, Pacal the Great. Von Däniken claimed the design represented a seated astronaut, whereas the iconography and accompanying Maya text identifies it as a portrait of the ruler himself with the World Tree of Maya mythology.

The origins of many religions are interpreted by von Däniken as reactions to encounters with an alien race. According to his view, humans considered the technology of the aliens to be supernatural and the aliens themselves to be gods. Von Däniken claims that the oral and written traditions of most religions contain references to alien visitors in the way of descriptions of stars and vehicular objects travelling through air and space. One such is Ezekiel’s revelation in the Old Testament, which Däniken interprets as a detailed description of a landing spacecraft.

Von Däniken’s theories became popularized in the U.S. after the NBC-TV documentary In Search Of Ancient Astronauts hosted by Rod Serling and the movie Chariots of the Gods.



ban youtube

Last Thursday, Oct. 3rd, during the day we noticed the Audio was dying on a number of YouTube Videos across the board. By evening all Audio on all YouTube videos on every post had been disabled.

YouTube also deleted the true democracy party youtube channel. We had two. They deleted our most popular channel with the phrase “This website no longer exists”. So when you goggle True Democracy Party, the first thing to come up was our popular youtube channel. A very easy way to find our website and see what’s going on. No more of that.

After two complete computer memory wipes and reboots, we realized the problem wasn’t with our computer system.
A few phone calls later across the country confirmed our most precious dreams were coming true, Youtube had pulled the Audio from all True Democracy party.net youtube videos. Unbelievable! WTH!

No one could believe it at first. There was ‘general shock’ all around. This was completely unprecedented. No one had seen anything like this before. Totally Cool!

Goggle, Google Chrome, Yahoo, Bing, Startpage, Dogpile, Ixquick, Duck Duck Go: every search engine we tried came back with the same results, except Mozilla/Firefox.


Mozilla/Firefox was the only search engine we tried that allowed the audio to play on our T.D.P. Embedded YouTube Videos.
FireFox to the rescue!

The current attack by YouTube-Goggle was lifted yesterday Oct. 9th, with all youtube audio being restored to our embedded youtube videos.

If you understand that YoutUbe belongs to Google and that Google is run by DARPA (D.A.R.P.A. – Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), you begin to understand how major this attack really was.

The general response, after the shock, was “You guys must of really pissed somebody off!”

Uh yea. That was our thoughts too!

god of war3


The Attack….was Major. We could see our numbers drop to almost nothing, no hits. within no time at all. Why visit a sight that doesn’t have audio on it’s videos.

That changed within 24 hrs. We simply put up a short note explaining the situation and that you could view our complete posts with audio on Firefox/Mozilla. The numbers jumped back up almost immediately.

Almost like there was no attack at all. People just switched to Firefox to visit our website. No big deal.

We want to thank Mozilla/Firefox for continuing to allow our YouTube Video Audio to still be played on their ‘Search Engine’ and we want to thank our loyal readers for continuing to visit our site during our recent Youtube/Google Website Assassination Event.

Were we worried?

Not even a little. We’ve always come back stronger from any attack launched against us by anybody. Always.



We don’t fear these False Alien Gods (F.A.G.S.) for short, anymore than we fear any other wild animal.
In Truth, it’s them who control DARPA. It’s them who control All Media. It’s them who control all the governments of the World including the U.S. Government. It’s them who control All Religions. All Religious Leaders are high ranking Illuminati.
It’s them, who want Humans to Kill each other.

Why go to War with somebody when you can simply have them Kill each other instead? Much more efficient.

It’s these Ancient Alien Arseholes, these Gay Alien Bass-Turds (GABs) that are the True Enemy of Humanity.

Governments, politicians, bankers, religions: these are all buffers for them to hide behind, to conceal themselves while at the same time, diverting our thoughts away from them and toward others.

These Beings are completely psychotic. They hurt us but want us to love them. Completely psychotic.

It’s them, we have a problem with.

It’s them, who are about to feel our pain, our Wrath!

They are Highly Telepathic and our thoughts (if not good towards them) are like a knife in their sides. We can’t kill them with our thoughts, yet. But we can cause them all kinds of Pain and severe discomfort.

And that will do, for now.

So don’t get mad at the Government, Politicians, Bankers, Religions etc.

Direct your thoughts of Anger and worse at those Ancient Alien Arseholes, Gay Alien Bass-Turds, False Alien Gods (F.A.G.S.), who want you and your children to be their slaves.

Direct your thoughts and energies at those who want to destroy you!

This is War, Silent and Hidden, but just as Deadly.

Also, and this is what I do, simply ignore them and think of ways to fix issues without involving the government. Ignore the government, media and holy wood as much as you possibly can.

Ignoring them is just as painful to them as bad thoughts towards them. Really!

They want to be loved, even if they hurt and kill us. Remember, these aren’t normal people or beings, they are completely Psychotic. Alien Psychos 🙂 OMG! How funny is that? Or should I say OMFAG (Oh My False Alien God 🙂

Keep a smile, Peace to All

Wade House
True Democracy Party Of America – Frederick MD. Chapter

We are just getting warmed up! Much More to Come!
They Messed with the wrong Human this time 🙂

ufo spaceship

Are Aliens really Gay?

I don’t know about all Aliens, but this group that runs the World is as queer as a $3 Dollar Bill.

Every Organization they control is ripe and overrunning with Homosexuality. The Media, Hollywood(Holy Wood – Tree Of Life), Government, Corporations. This is the reason Holy Wood and the Media push Homosexuality so heavily in our schools(they also control our educational system) and on our public.

“Washington D.C. has been in the news repeatedly for sex-abuse at the White House. Presidents Reagan, Bush Sr., Bush Jr. .. all busted for bringing male escorts into the White House.”

They want to turn us and our children like them. 2 words, NO THANKS!

I believe their species is Bisexual in nature. But they hate being made fun of. So calling them derogatory names pisses them off.

When you are pissed off, you make mistakes.
So we try to piss them off as much as possible 🙂

Once their cover is blown, they will be much easier to deal with.

They are also experts at DNA Manipulation, and can make themselves look like any earth species or combination of species that they want. And yes, they do walk this earth disguised as Humans.

Some as actors, some on TV newspeople, and some as politicians, even in government. They like to play parts where people ‘like’ them, like a popular Pope or President. But behind the scenes, they are as nasty and ugly as any very vile creature.

These beings kill and cause suffering as a way of life. Their ‘reality TV’ is to see real people really kill each other and suffer for real. Fake deaths don’t appease them!

This is why I call them Ancient Alien Arseholes. This is what they are. Psycho Aliens! Alien Psychos!

Read: THE LOST BOOK OF ENKI: Memoirs and Prophecies of an Extraterrestrial God (Ancient Astronaut). We have it here.
It explains everything. It’s the oldest writing in history. About 10,000 to 12,000 years old. Translations were just completed about 20 or 30 years ago.


[ FAMOUS FREEMASONS: Billy Graham, Jesse Jackson, Oral Roberts, Louis Farrakhan, Dalai Lama ]

[ THE LOST BOOK OF ENKI: Memoirs and Prophecies of an Extraterrestrial God (Ancient Astronaut) – Pre-Babylon, Pre-Sumeria, Pre-Humanity “The Origin Of Modern Man” ]

THE REASON BEHIND THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN: Unlimited Funding For Wall Street Paid For By Americans!



Whenever The Government does something, there is always a reason behind it.
The Huff Post/AOL revealed today the reasons behind this current government shutdown.

1) No Debt Limit Deal Reached At White House Meeting

2) Stocks Soar as Washington Hints at a Debt Ceiling Deal

The Goal “to increase the nation’s borrowing limit” to fully fund wall street with a “No Debt Limit Deal” (Unlimited Funding). This is why “Stocks Soared”.

Just like with the “Fiscal Cliff” and the “Sequester” ‘Events’, it’s all about a BS reason to give to Americans so they can take even more money from them. Legalized Theft, by those who control the Government.

They all work together with the Republicans playing the Bad Guy.

Bottom line, Wall Street is happy. That’s bad news for Americans.

Here is an article that explains why:

ADMIN NOTE: This was a hot topic at one time.
But today, I can only find 1 Article/Post on Goggle on this subject.

There are only 4 or 5 to start with.
1 has been taken down and replaced with a Wall Street Ad 🙂
The other 3 are actually Pro Wall Street.

Seems like anything on Goggle that suggests “what’s good for wall street is bad for Americans” is not really allowed.

Goggle is simply “Off The Hook” when it comes to censorship of relevant information.
Couldn’t locate any YouTube Videos on the subject also.

Wall Street is Protected!


(Image from Wikipedia)

What’s good for Wall Street is bad for America

To watch the Dow jockies on the teevee leaves one with the impression that Americans collectively win something when the industrial average rises above 10,000. But Americans don’t win anything. Most of them don’t even really understand what the 10,000 mark means, but they have learned to equate Wall Street winning with a booming American economy.

Do you earn a bonus when the Dow breaks 10,000? Does your job become more secure? Do your credit cards and medical bills disappear? Do your kids get college scholarships? Does the air you breathe become cleaner?

No, of course not. Americans don’t win anything when Wall Street prospers, and in fact, the opposite is usually true: what’s good for Wall Street is bad for America.

Pam Martens explains this “tails they win; heads you lose” philosophy:

Wall Street can and does make enormous profits on bets that share prices will decline (shorting), that companies will disappear (credit default swaps), that the economy will crater (interest rate swaps). And there’s a slogan on Wall Street: the trend is your friend. When it’s clear the bull is lying in the center of the ring (think Lehman’s death and the Merrill Lynch shotgun wedding on September 15, 2008), Wall Street moves its bets to the downside.

The market and its players have no conscience. There is no soul on Wall Street. The almighty dollar dictates everything, and so the boards of cash machines known commonly as “corporations” are legally obligated to their shareholders to make as much money as possible even if doing so demands engaging in things like shady lending practices that ultimately tank the entire US economy.

There is no government-provided incentive for Wall Street to behave morally. If the right players make tons of cash when they win, and shift the financial burden to taxpayers when they lose, why would they ever change their behavior? Wall Street makes crap, sells it to the public, and then when citizens get sicks, they’re responsible for their own medical bills.

Think: cigarettes, or as the FDA calls them, “nicotine delivery systems.” In 1995, Martens reminds us, the FDA told Americans that Big Tobacco was manipulating “nicotine delivery at each stage of production.” People were hooked on something that was killing them.

Insiders on Wall Street call their retail brokerage firms, now also dangerously merged with commercial banks, a “distribution” system. The investment banks create the toxic product, the brokers distribute it to the public under an enshrined carrot and stick system that is virtually identical at every major firm. That is, the internal research department puts out a buy recommendation. The brokers’ local manager holds a sales meeting and pushes the firm’s latest offerings. The brokers’ commission system dramatically favors risky products that the firm is pumping out over safer investments.

The reason the government must now create huge job programs is because the private sector has failed to provide for the masses. “According to the Labor Department, 9.3 million Americans could not find work as of January and millions more are involuntarily working part-time or too discouraged to look for work,” writes Martens.

So Wall Street corporations earn billions in profits racing to the bottom by slashing benefits and outsourcing American jobs overseas, while sheltering revenue in tax havens. Then, in the midst of failing to provide jobs to Americans, they ask for trillions more in taxpayer cash.

The suits provide nothing and ask for everything in return. Massive cojones, fellas.

Just in case anyone was worried President Obama may do the right thing and reinstate a Glass-Steagall wall between commercial and investment banks, fear not. Obama’s proposed bank curbs are “not a return to Glass-Steagall,” says the U.S. Treasury’s No. 2 official, Neal Wolin, who was also formerly general counsel to Lawrence Summers, a key proponent of repealing the Glass-Steagall Act during the Clinton administration.

No one has any intention of doing anything that will work. And you can quote them on that.

– Allison Kilkenny

SOURCE: [ True Slant.com ]




end the fed3


The British Fractional Reserve Banking System Is Destroying America!

Fractional Reserve Banking allows a very small group of people to create/make money out of thin air, from nothing.

They use this FREE MONEY to both buy and control the Political System and Corporations and they use these to Destroy our Country and Start Never Ending Wars – “Perpetual War” they call it.

“They” Poison the Air, Water, Land and Food supply. They also control all Media; TV, Online, Radio, Advertising, Movies, etc. and quite effectively hide most of what they are doing and lie about the rest.

But it all stems from their total control of “FREE MONEY”, which they get through the British Fractional Reserve Banking System.

Recently during a drive into Virginia from Maryland I noticed all the beautiful trees were gone from along the road/highway. It looked like a ‘war zone’, ugly. I knew a massive construction project was now underway there.

The land was being Raped/Destroyed for more commercial purposes. “Paving over trees to bring in a new parking lot” I believe a song said once.

Where did the money come from to destroy this land? A Loan – The British Fractional Reserve Banking System!
If they couldn’t make up money out of thin air, this might not be happening!

“Repeal the Fed or face another, bigger Fiscal Cliff Government Shutdown” Same news, different title.
Unless we Repeal or Rescind the Federal Reserve System and the British Fractional Reserve Banking System, we aren’t doing anything that will change anything.

We must End the Federal Reserve System, before they End US.

*** The only real question is “What do we replace it with?”
We now agree with The Daily Bell who said changing the current system from Private to Public will do nothing. It will still be controlled by the same people!

This itself is a work in progress, and we are accepting suggestions. E-mail us at contact info.

*** The Answer:
Thus, we need a completely ‘new’ system. And that depends upon how you look at others and the Country and World itself.
I look at America as a single entity or being. A Body, with us, individual Americans being the individual ‘Cells’ of this Body.

And as with any Living Body, it can get sick.

We are Sick right now and Un-Healthy. We have two National Diseases. Cancer, and what I term as “National Lupus”. The Cancer is eating away at the Country as a whole. Pollution of everything; air, water, land, fresh (land water) table and even space.

And we have National Lupus. Lupus being a disease that causes the ‘cells’ of a body to turn on itself and kill/destroy other healthy ‘cells’ of the same ‘Body’. It causes the ‘cells’ to destroy its own body.

That’s what we have.
Your arteries carry blood rich oxygen and nutrients from your heart to the rest of your body.
15% of the blood goes to the Brain, the rest goes to the entire body. 15%, not 99%.

Any system that allows 99% of production to go to the top 1% is an ‘unsustainable system’, period.
And those who control the U.S. Government, want more!
This is what happened to the Greek, Roman, and British Empires, and is what’s happening in America today.

This is the whole reason behind the True Democracy Party of America. This is what needs changed.
True Democracy is the vehicle to do this.
True Democracy is a True Vehicle of Change, not the LOL Democrats. Who BTW, work with the Republicans, not against them.
Anyone who thinks the Democrats or Republicans are for or care about Americans, are ‘deluded’ at best.

For a system to work, for a ‘body’ to function properly and be sustainable, all the ‘cells, and parts of the body must benefit.
Not just the head, not just the 1%

– T.D.P. Admin.


“I’ve been in the government for 25 years, this has happened before. And we always get paid.
This Furlough is nothing more than an unscheduled vacation for us.

The people who really get hurt are the Private Contractors that depend on government workers and contract work for their money.
The money they lose is lost. They won’t get paid and they won’t make it up. It’s a total lose for them.”

– Government Worker on the Government Shutdown

“It’s always the little guy that suffers.” T.D.P. Admin.

“When Elephants fight, it’s the grass that gets Trampled” – African Proverb


“We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board of governors and the Federal Reserve banks.

The Federal Reserve Board has cheated the Government and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt.

This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.

It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the money vultures who control it.”

“Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers, foreign and domestic speculators, and swindlers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe.”

– Congressman McFadden, who was chairman of the House of Representatives Banking and Currency Committee for ten years

Fox Propaganda prides itself on it’s ability to control how people think and what they talk about. And they love to use “The Simpsons” to help brainwash people.

They even bragged about how they used them to push the Global Warming Scam. Here’s there attempt to do the same with the so-called “Fiscal Cliff”.

Don’t believe the Hype. When you hear “Fiscal Cliff” think “END THE FED, NO MORE FISCAL CLIFFS!”

That’ll put some “Rocks in their Socks!”

Try and brain wash us will they?


The Secret Birth of the Federal Reserve Full Documentary
Masters Of The Universe

Remember, your money withheld via the progressive income tax goes to pay the interest on this debt held by the central bank and Communist China. You are literally a slave to Communists.

If the Fed’s interests were aligned with America’s, they’d simply write down the debt.

$15 trillion and counting… (some perspective: a trillion is a thousand billion. A billion is a thousand million, and a million is a thousand thousand).

True slavery will not be abolished in this country until we repeal the 16th Amendment and end the Fed.

[The Money Masters is a 1996 three and a half hour non-fiction, historical documentary film that discusses the concepts of money, debt, taxes, and describes their development from biblical times onward. It also covers the history of fractional-reserve banking, central banking, monetary policy, the bond market, and the Federal Reserve System in the United States. ]

Fed Now Largest Owner of U.S. Gov’t Debt—Surpassing China
By Terence P. Jeffrey
November 16, 2011

(CNSNews.com) – At the close of business on Tuesday, the debt of the federal government exceeded $15 trillion for the first time–with the largest single owner of the publicly held portion of that debt being the Federal Reserve.

Over the past year, as the Federal Reserve massively increased its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and entities in China marginally decreased theirs, the Fed surpassed the Chinese as the top owner of publicly held U.S. government debt.

In its latest monthly report, the Federal Reserve said that as of Sept. 28, it owned $1.665 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities. That was more than double the $812 billion in U.S. Treasury securities the Fed said it owned as of Sept. 29, 2010.

Meanwhile, as of the end of this September, entities in mainland China owned $1.1483 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, according to data published today by the U.S. Treasury Department. That was down slightly from the $1.1519 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities the Chinese owned as of the end of September 2010, according to the same Treasury Department report.

Thus, at the end of September 2010, the Chinese owned about $339.9 billion more in U.S. Treasury securities than the Fed owned at that time. By the end of September 2011, the Fed owned about $516.7 billion more in U.S. Treasury securities than the Chinese owned.

The U.S. Treasury Department divides the federal government’s debt into two general categories: debt held by the public—the type owned by the Chinese and the Federal Reserve—and “intragovernmental debt,” which consists of what essentially are IOUs the Treasury gives to government trust funds such as the Social Security trust when it takes and spends their money on other things.

The current total national debt of $15.0336 trillion, reported by the Treasury today, consists of approximately $10.3145 trillion in debt held by the public and $4.7191 trillion in intragovernmental debt.

The combined $2.8133 trillion in U.S. government debt held by the public that is now owned by the Federal Reserve and the Chinese equals more than 27 percent of all U.S. government debt held by the public.

Currently, foreign entities, including those in China, own $4.6603 trillion of the U.S. government debt held by the public. These foreign entities, together with the Federal Reserve, own a combined $6.3253 trillion of the U.S. government’s debt held by the public.

That $6.3253 trillion in Federal Reserve-and-foreign-held debt equals more than 61 percent of the U.S. government’s publicly held debt.

CNSNews.com is not funded by the government like NPR. CNSNews.com is not funded by the government like PBS.

CNSNews.com relies on individuals like you to help us report the news the liberal media distort and ignore. Please make a tax-deductible gift to CNSNews.com today. Your continued support will ensure that CNSNews.com is here reporting THE TRUTH, for a long time to come. It’s fast, easy and secure.



For centuries there has been a war between the “money controllers” and their opponents trying to wrest away control. One of the American Founding Fathers was Alexander Hamilton, who was a “money controller” who believed in a strong centralized federal government and a central bank. One of his opponents was President Andrew Jackson who vetoed the extension of the charter of the United States Bank (monopoly central bank) in 1832.

Some people believe that the “money controllers” constitute the “secret government” of the world, and that most or all of the ostensible national governments are mere puppets of the “secret government” behind the scene.

“As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow and the MONEY POWER of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working on the prejudices of the people until wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war.” – Abraham Lincoln


This report includes:

President Woodrow Wilson’s role

A license to steal – how fractional reserve banking works

One more turn of the screw – an old fable for modern times

The nation’s dictator

Proposed legislation to repeal the Federal Reserve Act

Paul Luther’s case

The Free Enterprise solution.

President Woodrow Wilson’s Role

On December 23, 1913, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act. President Woodrow Wilson, while keeping his campaign promise to the bankers, signed the Federal Reserve Act legislation which sold our country to a private organization of bankers.

Being a highly educated man, a brilliant professor and president of the prestigious Princeton University, President Woodrow Wilson was able to conclude within three years after the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the destruction of our great country. Referring to the great number of bankers who swarmed into the nation’s capitol, President Wilson said:

“I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world – no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but the Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominated men.”
Even before the Federal Reserve Act was passed, Thomas Jefferson predicted a huge national debt if we violated our Constitution and allowed a bank like the FED to exist. Read on to find out how to help abolish the FED and zero out the National debt

A License to Steal – How Fractional Reserve Banking Works

The book, Repeal The Federal Reserve Act, written by Rev. Casimir F. Gierut, describes in detail just how Congress sold out our nation to private bankers and how those private bankers fraudulently and illegally operate their businesses and cost taxpayers millions of dollars each year.

This book is not based on the opinions of people who have limited knowledge of the banking institutions. Nor is it based on the opinions of persons who had a personal grudge against the bank or bankers. This book is based on the sound judgments of dedicated American’s who have served as members of Congress.

This may very well be the greatest LICENSE TO STEAL story ever perpetuated in the history of mankind. When Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913, to present date, the Federal Reserve Banking System has been stealing from the Government as well as from the people of these United States.

The Federal Reserve Act gave these private group of Bankers the right to go directly into our country’s Bureau of Engraving and authorize the printing of currency at a cost of less than a penny a note. This is the first step in their swindle and the beginnings of the deceitful “fraction reserve” money ratio formula used in banking today. Take a look at what happened and come to your own conclusions.

It all started with the private bankers of the 16th century in Western Europe. The “goldsmith bankers,” as they were nicknamed in those days, would store people’s gold in a bank vault for safekeeping. The banker would then give the depositor a “receipt” for his gold. Anyone having possession of a receipt was able to go to the bank and claim the gold. People soon learned they could carry on trade and commerce by simply passing the receipt from hand to hand without ever drawing out the gold, and henceforth, those receipts began to circulate as “money.” This led the “goldsmith bankers” to a discovery which is the founding principle of the “fractional reserve” banking still in existence today. Congressman Wright Patman of Texas wrote about that time period:

“Few people who held the goldsmith’s receipt came to claim their gold. As the goldsmiths (bankers) realized this, they also realized that they could make loans of gold which had been in their safekeeping. That is, they could write receipts for gold to borrowers who, in fact, were not depositing new gold but borrowing the ownership of gold already in the goldsmith’s possession. This gold – actually the ‘receipts’ of ownership – being loaned by the goldsmith was not his to lend. He did not own it. But so long as the calls for gold by the original depositors were so infrequent, the goldsmith felt he could lend without undue risk and earn interest on a certain portion of the deposited gold”…

“In other words, the goldsmith wrote receipts for people who were not depositing gold. These receipts too circulated as money. So receipts for more gold than the banker actually had in his vaults were circulating. The goldsmith had only a fraction of the amount of gold needed to meet the claims [receipts] against him. They were issuing $10 in receipts for each $1 in gold. This is the fractional reserve system”…

“Although it is a long historical step from the goldsmith bankers to the present day, the logical development is quite short. For our modern system is only a refinement of “fractional reserve” banking developed so long ago (by the goldsmith’s bankers).”

So today we have evolved from operating with the goldsmith bankers to dealing with the international (Federal Reserve System) bankers, actually very similar in nature. Our investigation takes us to an examination of the Federal Reserve Act to more fully understand what happened in 1913 that is affecting us today in the 1990s.

Many people (and almost all bankers) are under the misconception that Congress “created” the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. This is not true. Congress merely “passed” the legislation and President Woodrow Wilson signed the Act into law. In fact, the Federal Reserve Act was initially composed as a proposal for legislation by a group of private bankers who met in deep secrecy and not by any members of Congress. Present at those meetings were the following bankers: Frank Vanderlip, President of National City Bank of New York; Henry P. Davidson, senior partner of J. P. Morgan Company; and Charles D. Norton, President of Morgan’s First National Bank of New York. These three powerful bankers invited Mr. Paul Moritz Warburg of M. M. Warburg Company of Hamburg, Germany, which was the chief German representative of the European banking family, the Rothschilds.

Mr. Paul Moritz Warburg would go on to mastermind the entire document that we recognize today as the Federal Reserve Act. As a partner of Kuhn, Loeb and Company Bank of New York, he was aware of the sentiments of the Congressmen who opposed the formation of a Central Banking System in the United States and knew they blamed the money panic of 1907 on the big New York bankers and the speculators of Wall Street. Thus, Mr. Warburg searched for a title that would not alert the Congressmen as to the true intent of the document he was preparing. He used the word “Federal” in the title which gave the false impression that this document involved the Federal Government. The Federal Reserve System had three very important elements:

The Federal Reserve System would be owned by private bankers; and thus would earn profit for the bankers.

In due time the bankers would gain control of the issuance of the nation’s money.

The bankers would use the credit of the United States by involving the United States in foreign affairs.
Warburg established four branch reserve banks in four different sections of the country seemingly independent of each other. This furthered the deception by giving the impression that the New York banks and Wall Street were not in control of the Federal Reserve System. The hidden factor was that all four regional reserve banks were united with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which was to be the main bank of the Central Banking System in our country.

When the bankers and Warburg were satisfied that they had accomplished what they had set out to do on paper, they invited Senator Carter Glass to introduce the Federal Reserve document on the floor of Congress. And so with expressed views of the bankers and Warburg’s “Federal Reserve Act,” the Central Banking System in the United States was born. The events that followed as a result of that legislation being introduced to Congress can be described with the following excerpt from Gierut’s book:

“Bank officials swarmed into Washington, D.C. to lobby for the passage of Warburg’s document. This legislation was strongly opposed by Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr. of Minnesota. He warned that this document was, in fact, establishing a Central Banking System. His greater concern was the fact that this type of banking system would create recessions, depressions, inflation, boom and bust of the nation’s economy.”
Opposition came from Senator Cabot Lodge, he said:

“I had hoped to support this bill, but I cannot vote for it as it stands, because it seems to me to contain features and to rest upon principles in the highest degree menacing to our prosperity, to stability in business, and to the general welfare of the people of the United States.”
And Senator Elihu Root denounced the Federal Reserve bill as an outrage on our liberties.

Many of the Congressmen foresaw the handwriting on the wall. The bankers would, in due time, have complete control over the money supply. The bankers would be the secret elite ruling over Congress itself.

Pressure on the Congressmen grew as the debate increased on the Paul Warburg document. The National banks contributed over $5 million to a fund for propaganda in favor of the passage of the bill.

As time went on the Democrats and Republicans took their stand. The Republicans were against this legislation. The Democrats made the Federal Reserve Act a part of their platform. The Democrats nominated Professor Woodrow Wilson, president of Princeton University, to run on the Democratic ticket for the Presidency of the United States.

The bankers throughout the country were all out campaigning for Woodrow Wilson. With their help, he was elected President of the United States.

After the election of November 1913, the bankers worked hard to bring the Federal Reserve Act to a vote near the Christmas holidays. They knew that some of the Congressmen would leave earlier for their Christmas vacation, therefore some would be absent at the time of voting on the bill. Secondly, with the Christmas holidays and Christmas rush, many Congressmen would not take the necessary time to study the Federal Reserve document. Thus, as the bankers planned, the House of Representatives voted on the Federal Reserve Act on December 22, 1913. The House voted on House Resolution 7837 (the Federal Reserve Act) introduced by Senator Glass.

On so important an issue, 103 empty Congressional seats meant less opposition to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act. Can you imagine 103 of our elected officials (76 Representatives and 27 Senators) were more concerned about going for their Christmas vacation than saving our country? Many of the Congressmen did not have time to read the entire bill. Many who did make an honest effort to study the legislation found themselves lost in the forest of technical banking vocabulary.

On December 23, 1913, the Day of Infamy, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act. Keeping his campaign promise to the bankers, President Woodrow Wilson signed the document which sold our country to private bankers.”

Congressman Wright Patman (R, Texas) gives an explanation of the formula of the Federal Reserve Banking System which is worthy to note. He explains how the entire banking system centers around the “fractional reserve money ratio formula” which is approved by the members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. To quote Congressman Patman:

“The formula consists of two parts. One is the amount of bank reserves which the member (local) banks of the Federal Reserve System have to their credit on the books (held at the district) Federal Reserve Banks. The second part is a regulation, which the Federal Reserve Board (of Governors) issues from time to time, telling the member (local) banks the maximum amount of bank deposits they may create per each dollar of their reserve deposit”…
“Expressed mathematically, this is a simple formula: A x B = C. A = Amount of (local) bank reserves; B = The number of dollars of deposits member (local) banks can create per each dollar of reserves; C = Total Bank Deposits. This is an example of the fractional reserve money ratio formula in terms of money: A x B = C.

A = Represents $10,000 the local member bank has in the reserve account.
B = The number of dollars member banks may create per each dollar in reserves is $10.00 for each $1.00 in reserve.
C = For the total bank deposits, multiply $10,000 by the present ratio of $10 for each $1 in reserve. This means $10,000 times $10 equals $100,000. The local bank may record a total of $100,000 in the “bank deposit” checking account for future loans.”

This is a very important formula and worthy of memorizing. This is the simple equation to understanding the entire Federal Reserve Banking System. This is how the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the thousands of member local banks operate without ever being exposed for the fraudulent bookkeeping entries, the printing of the “phony buck,” transacting fraudulent loans, creating unjust and illegal interest, and even confiscating property. All of this collectively issues the LICENSE TO STEAL.

To comprehend the magnitude of the passing of the Federal Reserve Act into law requires an in-depth study of our history, the important players both major and minor, and an analysis and understanding of the Congressional legislative history surrounding the issue. The purpose of this report is to give factual foundation to further motivate study and prompt you into action!

And action is just what Rev. Gierut’s organization, the “National Committee to Repeal the Federal Reserve Act,” is all about. He calls for the end of the fractional reserve money ratio formula through which acts of thievery are committed on a daily basis by the banking system. He urges all American taxpayers, Congressmen and the President of the United States to wake up and demand the Federal Reserve to stop using the illegal formula. Gierut offers a Constitutional Monetary Reform Plan as the means and necessary actions to save our country from total financial collapse and utter ruin. This plan consists of seven propositions which are in summary:

Abolish the fractional reserve money ratio formula. Replace it with a 100% reserve account for all future loans.

End all bond swindling schemes by issuing lawful currency backed with gold, or silver, or backed with United States Treasury Notes. Thus, it will become ujnecessary for the Government to issue bonds to back its own lawful currency.

Repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 11913 and all subsequent amendments.

Stop the issuance of unlawful Federal Reserve Notes.

Repeal the National Bank Act of 1863 and return the banks to the jurisdiction of the state they are located in.

United States take ownership of the 12 District Federal Reserve Bank Buildings which were constructed at the expense of the American taxpayers.

Cancel the National debt owed to the Federal Reserve Banking System as the law does not permit banks to profit from fraudulent practices.

As of the December 1994, the Federal Reserve Act remains intact. Year after year, legislation is introduced into congress to repeal the Act. Year after year, the legislation is voted down. The banks have continued to “buy off” congressmen and Senators which can easily be determined by Financial Democracy Campaign Analysis of Federal Election Commission which recorded donations by the largest bank holding companies in 1989-1990 to have been $9.3 million.

All that could be said about the most corrupt organization ring in America is best stated in a speech Congressman Louis McFadden of Pennsylvania delivered on the floor in Congress. On Friday, June 10, 1932, Congressman McFadden, who was chairman of the House of Representatives Banking and Currency Committee for ten years, spoke with authority on the subject of money and the Federal Reserve Banking System. In his address before the members of Congress, he stated:

“We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board of governors and the Federal Reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board has cheated the Government and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the money vultures who control it.”

“Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers, foreign and domestic speculators, and swindlers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe.”

“The danger that the country was warned against came upon us and is shown in the long train of horrors attendant upon the affairs of the traitorous and dishonest Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. This is an era of economic misery; and, for the conditions that caused that misery, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks are fully liable. THIS IS AN ERA OF FINANCED CRIME

One More Turn of the Screw
There is an old fable in which Aesop tells of the woodsman who went into the forest to get a handle for his axe. We’ve included this story in this report because it accurately describes what happened to us when the Federal Reserve Act was passed and signed into law. It seems the woodsman went into the forest and consulted with the trees, negotiating a handle for his axe. Now the large and mighty trees, the stronger ones, arrogating to themselves authority and ignoring the rights of others, thought that they could dispose of the smaller trees as they pleased.

The larger trees conferred together and decided to the grant the woodsman’s request, and so they gave to the woodsman the Ash tree. The Ash soon fell; but the woodsman had no sooner fitted the handle to his axe than he began upon the other trees.

He did not stop with the Ash, but he also hewed down the great and mighty Monarchs of the forest who had surrendered in their pride, the rights of the humble Ash. An old Oak was heard to complain to a neighboring Cedar; “If we had not given away the rights of the Ash we might have stood forever; but we have surrendered to the destroyer the rights of one, and now we are suffering from the same evil ourselves.”

The moral of the story: Don’t cut off somebody else’s to spite your face.

If we look closely at our Government and the way successive legislation destroys individual rights – knowing that government is being controlled and manipulated by a group of private bankers – could we really be dealing with woodsmen who always want more handles

The Nation’s Dictator
[Excerpts from speech, Congressional Record, by C.G. Binderup]

“YES, YOU, the Federal Reserve Banking System, you are the dictator in our great nation. You are the Nero who fiddles while Rome is burning.

We in Congress can study for years, travel for miles, and legislate for months, striving to enact sound legislation. We come to Washington holding aloft a mandate from the people. We come clothed in power by the ballots representing the will of 135,000,000 citizens. We come to enact laws for the general welfare, but in every nook and corner of the Nation’s Capital you are here, the invisible government, the power behind the throne of government. You with your red flag of economic dictatorship, you whisper into the ear of Congress, “Listen! We hold the power supreme, the power of money, and by this power we can dictate and determine just who shall occupy our seat.” You whisper into the ear of the Public Press, “Listen! We hold by the power of money the control of big business that buys your advertising contracts, that determines the life or death of your paper.” You whisper to the management of radio broadcasting stations, “Listen! We own the bonds and the stocks directly or indirectly. Your salary depends upon us.”

We pass worthy laws through the House and Senate, and the President signs. We attach a large penalty for violation, and congratulate ourselves that we have expressed the will of the people in laws, but you, the Federal Reserve Banking System, you hold in your hand a mightier power, the power of money, for by this power you control God Almighty’s first law, the law of self-preservation. By the power of money you command and inflict the penalties of starvation and deprivation, misery and want. You can break every law Congress can ever make. You can starve the most righteous soul until he will steal that his loved ones may have food and shelter.

You can crowd the most peaceful man until he will kill in murder and war that the reasonable wants of his loved ones may be satisfied. On the auction block of starvation and deprivation Man will sell his honor and Woman will sell her soul to satisfy that inward craving for food that God has put in the mind and body of man.

Yes, with this magic wand, the power of money, this firebrand of destruction, you can change to criminals our citizens of most worthy stamp, change a patriot into an enemy, love for country into hate. You can destroy – as you are doing today and as you have done twenty-three other times in the past – the homes of the nation, the units in the foundation of government, that determine the perpetuation of our great Democracy. You by the power of money can turn back the clock of time from civilization to the dark past. For no power on earth to man for evil or for good can equal the power of money.

Proposed Legislation to Repeal the Federal Reserve Act
Congressman Henry Gonzales introduced in Congress the following legislation which was referred to the House of Representative’s Committee on Banking and Currency. The actual bill calling for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act is as follows:


“To vest in the Government of the United States the full, absolute, complete, and unconditional ownership of the twelve Federal Reserve banks.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that:

(a) the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States is hereby authorized and directed forthwith to purchase the capital stock of the twelve Federal Reserve banks and branches, and agencies thereof, and to pay the owners thereof the par value of such stock at the date of purchase.

(b) All member banks of the Federal Reserve System are hereby required and directed to deliver forthwith to the Treasurer of the United States, by the execution and delivery of said documents as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, all the stock of said Federal Reserve banks owned or controlled by them, together with all claims of any kind or nature in and to the capital assets of the said Federal Reserve banks, it being the intention of this Act to vest in the Government of the United States the absolute, complete, and unconditional ownership of the said Federal Reserve banks.

(c) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated, out of any funds not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act.

Paul Luther’s Case

United States District Court

_______________DISTRICT OF_______________

CIV93 0484 SC
v. CASE NUMBER_____________________


TO: (Name and Address of Defendant)
U.S. Attorney General, Washington D.C.
Department of Justice, Room 4400
Main Justice Building
10th & Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20530
(202) 514-2001

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to file with the Clerk of this Court and serve upon

Paul N. Luther (Pro Se)
6505 Natalie Ave. NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
(505) 884-5735

an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within __60__ days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.


APR 15 1993




CIV93 0484 SC
v. No.___________________


Plaintiff alleges:
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has been printing paper money, which it has no power to do and is, therefore, unconstitutional. Article I, Section 8, of The Constitution of the United States of America states at clause five:

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
This phrase allows the Federal Government to “coin Money” and “regulate the Value thereof” only. There is no specific enumeration of power for Congress to emit or print paper money or any other medium of exchange other than coin. More importantly, during the Federal Convention of 1787 the Founding Fathers (Founders) directly addressed the issue of printing paper money, which was also referred to at the time as “emit[ting] bills.” The Founders took explicit and direct action to exclude this power from the Federal government and the State governments.

The following excerpt was taken from the Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, Reported by James Madison, (W. W. Norton & Company, p. 389, 1987). On Monday, August 6, 1787, the following draft Constitution was presented to the Convention, quoted in part here:

Monday August 6th. [1787] In Convention

Sect. I. The Legislature of the United States shall have the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises;
To regulated commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States;
To establish an uniform rule of naturalization through the United States;
To coin money;
To regulate the value of foreign coin;
To fix the standard of weights and measures;
To establish Post-offices;
To borrow money, and emit bills on the credit of the United States;
To appoint a Treasurer by ballot; . . .
(emphasis added)
On Wednesday, August 15, 1787, the following discussion about “emit[ting] bills” was made at the Convention (id. at 470-471):

Wednesday August 15. [1787] In Convention

Mr. Govr. Morris moved to strike out “and emit bills on the credit of the U. States” – If the United States had credit such bills would be unnecessary: if they had not, unjust & useless.

Mr. Butler, 2nd the motion.

Mr. Madison, will it not be sufficient to prohibit the making them a tender? This will remove the temptation to emit them with unjust views. And promissory notes in that shape may in some emergencies be best.

Mr. Govr. Morris, striking out the words will leave room still for notes of a responsible minister which will do all the good without the mischief. The Monied interest will oppose the plan of Government, if paper emissions be not prohibited.

Mr. Ghorum was for striking out, without inserting any prohibition. If the words stand they may suggest and lead to the measure.

Col. (note 1 below) Mason had doubts on the subject. Congress he thought would not have the power unless it were expressed. Though he had a mortal hatred to paper money, yet as he could not foresee all emergences, he was unwilling to tie the hands of the Legislature. He observed that the late war could not have been carried on, had such a prohibition existed.

Mr. Ghorum. The power as far as it will be necessary or safe, is involved in that of borrowing.

Mr. Mercer was a friend to paper money, though in the present state & temper of America, he should neither propose nor approve of such a measure. He was consequently opposed to a prohibition of it altogether. It will stamp suspicion on the Government to deny it a discretion on this point. It was impolitic also to excite the opposition of all those who were friends to paper money. The people of property would be sure to be on the side of the plan, and it was impolitic to purchase their further attachment with the loss of the opposite class of Citizens

Mr. Elseworth thought this a favorable moment to shut and bar the door against paper money. The mischiefs of the various experiments which had been made, were now fresh in the public mind and had excited the disgust of all the respectable part of America. By withholding the power from the new Government more friends of influence would be gained to it than be almost any thing else. Paper money can in no case be necessary. Give the Government credit, and other resources will offer. The power may do harm, never good.

Mr. Randolph, notwithstanding his antipathy to paper money, could not agree to strike out the words, as he could not foresee all the occasions which (note 2) might arise.

Mr. Wilson. It will have a most salutary influence on the credit of the U. States to remove the possibility of paper money. This expedient can never succeed whilst its mischiefs are remembered, and as long as it can be resorted to, it will be a bar to other resources.

Mr. Butler remarked that paper was a legal tender in no Country in Europe. He was urgent for disarming the Government of such a power.

Mr. Mason was still averse to tying the hands of the Legislature altogether. If there was no example in Europe as just remarked, it might be observed on the other side, that there was none in which the Government was restrained on this head.

Mr. Read, thought the words, if not struck out, would be as alarming as the mark of the Beast in Revelations.

Mr. Langdon had rather reject the whole plan than retain the three words (“and emit bills”).

On the motion for striking out
New Hampshire ay.
Massachusetts ay.
Connecticut ay.
New Jersey no.
Pennsylvania ay.
Delaware ay.
Maryland no.
Virginia ay.*
North Carolina ay.
South Carolina ay.
Georgia ay. (note 3)

Footnotes to above excerpt

The word “Mr.” is substituted in the transcript for “Col.”

The word “that” is substituted in the transcript for “which.”

In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, *North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye-9; New Jersey, Maryland, no-2.

* This vote in the affirmative by Virg. was occasioned by the acquiescence of Mr. Madison who became satisfied that the striking out the words would not disable the Govt. from the use of public notes as far as they could be safe & proper; & would only cut off the pretext for a paper currency, (note 4) and particularly for making the bills a tender (note 5) either for public or private debts.

The transcript italicized the works “paper currency” and “a tender.”

The word “was” is here inserted in the transcript.

Had there been no mention of “emit[ting] bills,” which was also referred to as paper money or paper currency during the Convention debates as shown above, there may be a slight justification for assuming the Founders did not totally shut the door to paper emissions Even then, it would be very doubtful that this was an implied power when one considers James Madison’s definitive statement from The Federalist (Hamilton, Alexander; Jay, John; and Madison, James; Original Text, Random House, Introduction by Edward M. Earle, p. 303, 1937) on the powers of the Federal Government, namely:

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined.
The Federalist No. 45

And, Col. Mason’s concern about the power to emit bills in the debates of August 15, 1787, in that he thought Congress (Madison, supra, at 470):

. . . would not have the power [to emit bills] unless it was expressed.
But the issue of printing money by the Federal Government was specifically addressed in the Convention, and there is no doubt that the Founders intention was to exclude paper emissions from the Federal Government. How much clearer to the Founders intent can there be made than nine States voting to strike “and emit bills on the credit of the U. States,” an overwhelming majority, and only two voted in favor of leaving the words as presented in the draft constitution on August 6, 1787. Had the Founders wanted to leave the door open to paper money they could have just as easily left the words as presented in the draft.

Also, these excerpts confirm beyond a doubt that the Founders had a clear understanding of the term, “coin money.” At the time, as it does now, this referred to the use of alloys, such as gold and silver, to be struck into coins through the minting process. And as for the “regulation of the value thereof,” it was common knowledge then, as now, that this meant the establishment of the relationship to a specified quantity of alloy, such as gold or silver, to a specific monetary unit. As an example of the understanding of the time, Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Plan for Establishing Uniformity in the Coinage, Weights, and Measures of the United States, Communicated to the House of Representatives, July 13, 1790, (The Library of America, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 83-19917, p. 407) the following about the value of coins:

Let it be declared, therefore, that the money unit, or dollar of the United States, shall contain 371.262 American grains of pure silver.
Additional evidence demonstrating that the Founders were well aware of the terms “coin money” and “emit bills” can be found in The Federalist, a compilation of eighty-five (85) essays that were used to explain the meaning of the proposed Constitution prior to its ratification. When referring to the powers of the Federal Government as they relate to money, James Madison wrote (Hamilton, Jay, Madison, supra, at 276):

The Federalist No. 42

All that need be remarked on the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, is, that by providing for this last case, the Constitution has supplied a material omission in the articles of Confederation. The authority of the existing Congress is restrained to the regulation of coin struck by their own authority, or that of the respective States. It must be seen at once that the proposed uniformity in the value of the current coin might be destroyed by subjecting that of foreign coin to the different regulations of the different States.
The punishment of counterfeiting the public securities, as well as the current coin, is submitted of course to that authority which is to secure the value of both.

Similarly, when referring to the States, James Madison wrote (Hamilton, Jay, Madison, supra, at 289):

The Federalist No. 44

A FIFTH class of provisions in favor of the federal authority consists of the following restrictions on the authority of the several States.
1. “No State shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make any thing but gold and silver a legal tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex-post-facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts; or grant any title of nobility.”

…The right of coining money, which is here taken from the States, was left in their hands by the Confederation, as a concurrent right with that of Congress, under an exception in favor of the exclusive right of Congress to regulate the alloy and value. In this instance, also, the new provision is an improvement on the old. Whilst the alloy and value depended on the general authority, a right of coinage in the particular States could have no other effect than to multiply expensive mints and diversify the forms and weights of the circulating pieces. The latter inconvenience defeats one purpose for which the power was originally submitted to the federal head; and as far as the former might prevent an inconvenient remittance of gold and silver to the central mint for recoinage, the end can be as well attained by local mints established under the general authority.

The extension of the prohibition to bills or credit must give pleasure to every citizen, in proportion to his love of justice and his knowledge of the true springs of public prosperity. The loss which America has sustained since the peace, from the pestilent effects of paper money on the necessary confidence between man and man, on the necessary confidence in the public councils, on the industry and morals of the people, and on the character of republican government, constitutes an enormous debt against the States chargeable with this unadvised measure, which most long remain unsatisfied; or rather an accumulation of guilt, which can be expiated no otherwise than by a voluntary sacrifice on the altar of justice, of the power which has been the instrument of it. In addition to these persuasive considerations, it may be observed, that the same reasons which show the necessity of denying to the States the power of regulating coin, prove with equal force that they ought not to be at liberty to substitute a paper medium in the place of coin. Had every State a right to regulate the value of its coin, there might be as many different currencies as States, and thus the intercourse among them would be impeded; retrospective alternations in its value might be made, and thus the citizens of other States be injured, and animosities be kindled among the States themselves. The subjects of foreign powers might suffer from the same cause, and hence the Union be discredited and embroiled by the discretion of a single member. No one of these mischiefs is less incident to a power in the States to emit paper money, than to coin gold or silver. The power to make any thing but gold and silver a tender in payment of debts, is withdrawn from the States, on the same principle with that of issuing a paper currency.

Even though Madison is here referring to the States, how can an argument explaining the destructive and detrimental effects of paper money not also be true for the Federal Government? The record of history is clear on the subject.

Why was it necessary for the Founders to specifically state that no State shall “emit bills” and for it to not to be so specifically addressed in a similar fashion for the Federal government? The Founders were well aware of the destructive and detrimental effects of papers money and excluded the power from the Federal Government, and to ensure that the State governments did not print paper money the Founders had to explicitly state so, otherwise the States would have had the power. At the time it was understood that those powers not enumerated in the Federal Constitution were left to the States or to the People. James Madison stated in The Federalist, No. 45 (Hamilton, Jay, Madison, supra, at 303) that:

Those [powers] which are to remain to the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former [Federal Government power] will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs; concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.
This was later reemphasized in the Tenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

WHEREFORE, the damages to myself and to the Country are substantial, and if no action is taken to correct this error, future damages through the Federal Government’s inflation and the other pestilent effects of paper money will certainly occur – as the records of history show. It is not my intent to receive a monetary award for my damages, but to see that this error is corrected by having the Court require that the Federal Government refrain from printing paper money and do exactly what the Federal Constitution at Article I, Section 8, Clause S requires, so future damages do not occur to myself, my family or the citizens of the United States of America. This error has occurred due to the specious reasoning of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the error continues to persist do to the Court’s decision to rely on faulty case law. By taking an oath to uphold and defend the United States Constitution, it is the Court’s responsibility to correct this error by following the true intent of the Constitution and refrain from writing law.

[Signature] 04/15/93
Paul N. Luther (pro se)
6505 Natalie Ave., NE
Albuquerque, NM 871 10
(505) 884-5735
“I hereby certify that a copy of the
foregoing pleading was mailed to
opposing counsel/parties of record
on the _____ day of ___________

The Free Enterprise Solution
All the initiatives, that I’ve come across so far, to do something about the “banking problem” have been very useful in that they’ve helped educate me. They’ve also helped educate a great number of other people. These initiatives basically involve campaigns to persuade the U.S. Congress to change the system. My guess is that through these campaigns about 10,000,000 Americans have been educated to see the Federal Reserve system as the great evil it is.

The Free Enterprise solution is to create alternative systems to outcompete the Fed. Some of these systems are already in operation.

We also need to implement “Riegel-type” systems. Such systems are based on the principles expounded by E.C. Riegel about 50 years ago in his book Private Enterprise Money.

Then we also need private coinage – probably gold and silver coins.

In order for the above free-enterprise alternatives to outcompete the monopoly systems, maybe 100,000 participants would constitute a critical mass. In other words, if we can persuade 1% of the Americans who see the Federal Reserve system as evil to participate actively in our free-enterprise alternatives, the game is over for the monopoly systems!

And what about the so-called “national debt?” Well, for people who exit the monopoly systems the “national debt” simply becomes a joke. The people who choose to remain in the monopoly systems will be able to play to their hearts’ content with their “national debts” and phony funny money!

Downloaded from the Personal Empowerment Resources Web-Site: http://www.mind-trek.com/


[ SOURCE: Fed Now Largest Owner of U.S. Gov’t Debt—Surpassing China ]


The Secret of Oz: Solutions For a Broken Economy

What’s going on with the world’s economy? Foreclosures are on the rise, unemployment is skyrocketing and this may only be the beginning. Is it possible that solutions to the world’s economic problems were embedded in one of the most beloved children’s stories of all time, “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz?” The yellow brick, the Emerald City of Oz, Dorothy’s silver slippers (changed to ruby slippers for the movie version) — all powerful symbols of author L. Frank Baum’s belief that the people, not the big banks, should control the quantity of a nation’s money.


[ RESCIND THE FED-END THE FED-REPEAL THE FED NOW!: “From $16 Trillion to Open Ended Bank Bailouts! ]

FREE POISON SEASON – GET YOUR FLU SHOT: Free! Free! Free! Get Your Flu Shot Here! :) [T.D.P. Compilation of Vaccine Posts]

flu shot free

flu shot free2

T.D.P. Compilation of Vaccine Posts:

Recent Comment – What is with the so called FREE flu shots????
My GOD what is with the ‘free’ flu shots?? First is drugstores, now its also grocery stores, now TODAY there is a big push at my place of work to get a ‘free’ shot!!! There is an internal website and I can’t believe how many people are commenting saying how they don’t work, how they get sick soon after getting one, etc etc.

Some woman ‘in charge’ of my company’s free flu shots got on there and commented that the ‘shots are at no cost to our medical plan’ come get your free poison.


Get your Free Flu Shot signs are everywhere. FREE! And some stores are even offering Gifts and 20% off shopping discounts if you get your Free Flu Shot. Desperate to poison you, they are. Are Americans waking up? Getting less Flu Shots? Skipping their Poison Shots?

1) “ALL VACCINES ARE CONTAMINATED, EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM!” – Dr. Maurice Hillerman, Former Head Of Vaccines at Merck


3) U.S. GOVERNMENT ADMITS ‘SAFE VACCINES’ KILL 2,699 U.S. CHILDREN A YEAR!: “Selling Sickness” The Hoax Of modern Medicine: 7 Facts You Need To Know

vaccines kill

4) VACCINES – A CASE STUDY: Vaccinations Part 1: Medical Research On S.I.D.S. And Epidemics ***

5) FROM 1 IN 10,000 TO 1 IN 88 U.S. CHILDREN WITH AUTISM: Can We Trust the CDC Claim that There is No Link Between Vaccines and Autism?

6) VACCINES TOXIC TRUTH: Mercury, Autism And The Global Vaccine Agenda

Indian Child Getting Oral Polio Vaccine

Indian Child Getting Oral Polio Vaccine

7) VACCINE LEAVES 47,500 CHILDREN IN INDIA PARALYZED: Doctors Change Names of Diseases When Vaccines Do Not Work – VacTruth

8) PARALYSIS HAUNTS ‘POLIO FREE’ INDIA: 30 Scientific Studies Showing Link Between Vaccines And Autism

Bill Gates promotes more vaccines, not nutrition or clean water, for children in Third World countries

Bill Gates promotes more vaccines, not nutrition or clean water, for children in Third World countries

HEMP FOR AMERICA – HEMP FOR VICTORY: Industrial Hemp Education In 3 Min. / Hemp For Victory – USDA Promotional Film For American Farmers

“Hemp is of first necessity to the wealth and protection of the country” – Thomas Jefferson

Industrial Hemp was called a billion dollar crop in the 1930’s. Hemp can produce over 30,000 different products; from paper, plastic, fuel, clothing, to FOOD. Why is this super plant illegal to grow in the US? Conspiracy.

Industrial Hemp starts from soil, seeds and hands, to manufacturing thousands of renewable eco-safe products from paper/tissue and clothes to even green fuel and energy. We may not be able to control the world economy and practices, but with Industrial Hemp, we can create and control our own. This is an opportunity for people to vote for each other and future generations. It’s BIG!!

The OIL from Industrial Hemp is a Corner Stone of ‘Our’ New Energy Platform, being the Basis and Bedrock of 2 technologies that can get us off Fossil Fuels within 5 years or less.

The 200+ Mile Per Gallon POGUE Carburator and the 1000% Fuel Increase Tom Ogle Vapor Fuel Systems. Both fully tested and Patented. All Related Patents are completely Expired. We are free to build at will, and power them on Bio Mass Fuels, the most cost effective and easiest to grow being Hemp.

90% of all the OIL Imported goes to fuel our automobiles.
If we produce “Add-On” after market Fuel Systems that provide 200 MPG Minimum and then use fuel derived from Industrial Hemp Oil to make up the difference and fuel the new products, plus it can make all the parts of the car except the engine, you begin to see the power of the Super Plant. And that’s only the beginning of what it can do for us.

Industrial Hemp has a THC Value of 2% or less. “It can’t get you high, unless you smoke a joint the size of a telephone pole.” – Ron Paul

So why is it classified the same as Heroin and Cocaine? This is INSANE, from our point of view and makes no REAL sense.

Hemp for Victory – Entire Film – US Government asks farmers to grow it

Produced by the US Government in 1942…Interesting to learn that Dupont Chemical funded the anti- hemp / marijuana effort. This is because they had patents on new synthetic fibers and Hemp had a new machine that would put them out of business if hemp were to be used for clothes. Dupont also sold – and still does many of the chemicals to wood pulp producers… so we continue to cut down forests… when Hemp could save millions of trees, be used as an alternative bio fuel and the US could easily grow enough hemp to eliminate the need for oil… so Big oil does not want hemp legal either. Neither do the drug companies… they can’t patent it. They would rather keep selling you their drugs. By keeping it illegal the lawyers, courts etc… also make a buck. You can only get high from the female flower – nobody has ever died from smoking a joint. Of course the alcohol and tobacco companies would prefer to keep their monopoly as well. So we have all the BIG Corporate players… against legalizing it. Yet if it were legalized – we would solve many issues and have a multi billion dollar hemp economy as it can be used for 1000’s of products. A few other good films to watch are run from the cure & hemp conspiracy – Google it!

Industrial Hemp Uses – Lotus Engineering
Building Car Parts

What is Industrial Hemp ~

Industrial Hemp is a variation of cannabis sativa. It is the most useful plant known to mankind. In fact, cannabis sativa means useful (sativa) hemp (cannabis). Hemp is not marijuana.

Hemp is used to make over 25,000 consumer products. From hemp apparel and accessories to house wares and hempseed oil cosmetics, hemp is an eco-shopper’s dream. Some of the products made are: clothing, shoes, diapers, rope, canvas, cellophane, paints, fuels, chain lubricants, biodegradable plastics, paper, fiberboard, cement blocks, food, cosmetics, and soap. Hemp is the longest and strongest natural fiber known to man.

Hemp for Food
Hemp seeds are drug-free and extremely nutritious. They can be eaten whole, pressed into edible oil like soybeans, or ground into flour for baking. They are one of the best sources of vegetable protein. Hemp seed has the second highest amount of protein of any food (soy being the highest). Hemp seed protein closely resembles the protein found in the human blood, making it easier to digest than soy protein. They contain a full complement of essential amino acids, essential fatty-acids (EFA’S), and have been shown to lower blood cholesterol and dissolve plaque in coronary arteries. As a supplement to the diet, these oils can reduce the risk of heart disease.

Hemp for Body Care
Hemp seed oil is perfectly suited for hair and skin care. Its nutritional value, combined with its moisturizing and replenishing EFA’s, make it one of the best vegetable body care foundations. Hemp seed oil’s EFA complement includes polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega-3, omega-6, omega-9, linoleic acid, and gamma linoleic acids (GLA’s). Although they are very effective in skin care maintenance, GLA’s are rarely found in natural oils. Hemp is an excellent source of GLA’s.

Paper from hemp
There is no tree or plant on Earth capable of producing as much paper per acre as hemp. Hemp paper is naturally acid-free. The oldest printed paper in existence is a 100 percent hemp Chinese text dated to 770 AD. Thomas Jefferson drafted both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution on hemp paper.

One acre of hemp can produce as much paper as four acres of trees. Hemp paper is suitable for recycle use 7 or 8 times, compared to 3 times for tree paper.

The hemp paper process also utilizes less energy and fewer chemicals than tree paper processing and doesn’t create the harmful dioxins, chloroform, or any of the other 2,000 chlorinated organic compounds that have been identified as byproducts of the wood paper process.

Hemp was an important source of paper fiber until the early 1900’s when chemicals were developed to advance the wood paper pulp industry. Wood pulp paper rode the chemical revolution to its apex before the public health hazards of toxic chemicals were an issue and before the environmental consequences of clear-cutting forests were appreciated.

Hemp is a sustainable, annual crop that is ready for harvest just 120 days after going to seed, compared to trees which take tens or hundreds of years to reach maturity. Further, harvesting hemp doesn’t destroy the natural habitats of thousands of distinct animal and plant species.

Hemp as fuel
Hemp seeds have provided a combustible fuel oil throughout human history. More importantly, though, the same high cellulose level that makes hemp ideal for paper also makes it perfect for ethanol fuel production. Ethanol is the cleanest-burning liquid bio-alternative to gasoline.

Ethanol is derived from plant cellulose. Plants absorb carbon dioxide, water, and sunlight and produce oxygen and cellulose, which contains the sun’s energy captured in plant cells. When ethanol combusts, it releases energy, water vapor, and carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide is then absorbed by plants, along with water and sunlight, to create more oxygen and cellulose. It is a clean and sustainable cycle.

Since gasoline engines are a primary source of carbon monoxide and greenhouse gases, alternative fuels such as ethanol could contribute significantly to the rejuvenation of our atmospheric air quality. Hemp provides a sustainable, renewable, and natural alternative to toxic fossil fuels.

Industrial Hemp Uses

Topics: Lotus Eco Elise, Hemp as building material, hemp as an insulation


The Power of Hemp and its countless uses

A short film about the miracle plant called hemp. Get to know potentially the greatest land plant that could tremendously benefit humanity and the planet and find out why the criminal federal government doesn’t want you to grow it in the US.


Hempcrete Technology Commerical – Strongest Building Material



Billion Dollar Crop: The history and advantages of hemp as an industrial fiber

This surprising video explains the environmental interest in the non-drug variety of hemp as a versatile industrial fiber, and documents the history of its prohibition.

Backed by years of worldwide research, BILLION DOLLAR CROP exposes the political and industrial manipulations, which outlawed one of the most valued plants in history.

Hemp once provided the paper on which US banknotes were printed, the cloth for the original Levi jeans, as well as the sails and rigging of ships. During World War II it was of such strategic importance that the US Government encouraged farmers to convert to hemp cultivation.

BILLION DOLLAR CROP shows how the recently developed, non-drug variety of hemp is being researched and cultivated internationally because of the plant’s versatile qualities and environmental friendliness. This program takes the audience on a world tour from Australia to the United Kingdom, and from The Netherlands to France and the US. It illustrates how hemp is being cultivated as an industrial fiber for use as an alternative to wood for paper production, to cotton for clothes, and to plywood for construction. We all benefit, especially our forests and topsoil.

Directed by Barbara Ann Chobocky
Produced with Michael Cordell and Jeffrey Bruer



This video highlights a 1914 series $10 bill of a hemp harvest that is printed ‘right on the money.’ This paper was also made of hemp.

The first Federal Reserve Bank notes were issued in 1914. This $10 bill bears the signature of Andrew Mellon, the Secretary of the Treasury under multiple presidential administrations.

Mellon was also the head of several oil companies and banks. Mellon was the uncle of Harry Anslinger, the first leader of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 1931-1961.

Anslinger was the main cheerleader of the Reefer Madness misinformation campaign and the primary person responsible for marijuana prohibition.


Cancer Cure Hemp Oil – Rick Simpson and testimonies

Rick Simpson tell us about his goal to help people heal themselves using hemp oil to cure cancer and other diseases. We also hear many testimonies of the possitive effects of hemp oil and we get a glimpse of the struggle to fight the system that constantly tries to stop this natural medicine. These clips are from the movie “Run From The Cure – The Rick Simpson Story” from 2008.

Cancer can only manifest if we forget the true nature of who we really are. That is if we don’t live our lives the way that is best for us, that is true to us and if we keep doing that for too long. It’s not our fault it’s come to this. We have been deceived and deluded from the truth about who we really are. We just have to remember! We are doing that right now all over the planet.


What are The Nutritional Benefits Hemp Seeds?

Hemp seed comes from the hemp plant, grown for use as a food source. We take a closer look at hemp seed nutrition and some of the key factors that make it a top 10 superfood. http://www.superfoods-for-superhealth…


Raw Cannabis Advantages – William Courtney, MD

Interview during Seventh National Clinical Conference on Cannabis Therapeutics in Tucson, AZ, April 2012. Dr. Courtney, a physician in California, explains why juicing raw cannabis accesses more cannabinoids and other phyto-compounds than heated cannabis.
Interview conducted by Mark Pedersen for Patients Out of Time, hosts of the conference.



Reefer Madness (1936) – Colorized and Restored Version

The propaganda, turned, cult-movie about Marijuanausage. Notice the colorful postmillenium editing. Also great acting and cutting. A great film about pre-first world war propaganda in America

Reefer Madness is an exploitation film portraying the tragic events that ensue when high school students are lured by pushers to try “marihuana”: a hit and run accident, manslaughter, suicide, attempted rape, and madness.

It was originally financed by a church group and made under the title Tell Your Children. The film was intended to be shown to parents as a morality tale attempting to teach them about the dangers of cannabis use. Soon after being shot, however, the film was purchased by producer Dwain Esper, who re-cut the film for distribution on the exploitation film circuit.



This is a Great article/post on the subject by Santa Cruz: Legalize Hemp: The Case for Reviving America’s First Crop