February 21, 2018

GOOGLE ENCRYPTING TRUE DEMOCRACY PARTY CODE: So Some Posts Can’t Be Found Online “Cool! We Still Got It! Time To Bring The Heat!”


At The T.D.P., we knew that our website was being Attacked by Google, old news. We knew Google was deleting some of our Posts and changing the titles of others, to make them harder to find online. We knew this and reported on it also.

But now Google is actually Encrypting some of our posts so they can’t be found online, even if you have all the information.

We’ve been getting information from others that we were being heavily censored online. People are not finding our Posts online, even when we tell them exactly how it’s worded and where it can be located.

Well we just discovered recently that Google is actually, not just changing, but Encrypting some of our posts so they will never be found online.

Here are a couple of recent examples, but we have noticed this for the past few weeks.

The top lines are the post titles and the bottom line is how it’s coded into Google’s internet search engine


UN Global Gun Cabal Passes Historic (VOLUNTARY / NO ENFORCEMENT) A.T.T.
Unb> globalb> gunb> cabalb> passesb> historicb> (voluntary / nob> enforcement) a.t.t.

These are examples of how a computer program would Encrypt Information so it can’t be found. They change the letter casing and add other letters to our original words. There is absolutely no way anyone could find our posts by doing a Title Search. Even if they type it in Letter for Letter as we posted it.

The Elections over and we are still being Censored.
They want to “Leave No Doubt” about the chances of a New True Democracy Party getting started in the United States.

We got news for them.


Didn’t they learn anything from our Operation: Silent Thunder, Natural Skies?

They can’t control us with their computers and internet! But of course, that won’t stop them from trying.
We’ve been Banned from Commenting on AOL/Huff Post and YouTube. Not because we are vulgar or lie.

Youtube has no problem with the N-Word, curse words or vulgarity. It’s only the Truth that gets censored on Youtube.
Others who notice this and try to put through a little truth through Youtube or AOL/Huff Post Comments, we have friends, are having the comments censored.

No views accept “hate” and the “Party Line” are allowed in the Mainstream Media. Even comments are now Heavily Censored.

To say that we need a “New (Google Free) Information Highway is an understatement.

rain tax

But things are Heating Up. A new Nation Wide State By State Rain Tax has got people to notice the utter futility of relying on a Government that would even consider Taxing rain.

People are Flooding out of their homes and away from the “Control Net” to their respective City Halls and State Representatives.

If a Rain Tax is the best this government can come up with, based on lies of course, then we need a New Government.
More exactly, a New Form Of Governorship.

We need to replace Minority Rule with Majority Rule.

Why? With Minority Rule, you get things like a “Rain Tax”. No average Citizen would ever vote for a Rain Tax.
That’s just silly.

And to base it on lies that it’s the citizens who are damaging and polluting the waters of America.

It’s Corporate Dumping, Hydro-Fracking (pumping poison into the ground), and Farm Runoff (animal waste and fertilizers) that are doing the vast majority of the water pollution, and to turn around and penalize the citizens with New Taxes and a so-called Rain Tax.

Oh Yeah! We are Ready for Change.

This is the Moment the True Democracy Party has been waiting on.
We knew if we just let them have all the Rope They Wanted, that they would Hang Themselves.

Funny how something so small as a Rain Tax, could undo all their years of hard planning and work at getting “Their People” into public office.

But Rain is something everyone sees and everyone knows about. They picked the wrong thing to tax in America this time.

And we love them for it.

The question is, who are the Idiots? Them for doing it, or US if we let them get away with it.

Can you say “Special Elections”?

FROM 1 IN 10,000 TO 1 IN 88 U.S. CHILDREN WITH AUTISM: Can We Trust the CDC Claim that There is No Link Between Vaccines and Autism?


It’s time to take the CDC to U.S. Court. The People Of the United States Vs. CDC (Center For Disease Control)

* If the U.S. Department of Health admits in U.S. Court that “Safe Vaccines kill 2,699 U.S. children a year and cause Autism”…
* If there are 30 (Peer Reviewed) Scientific Studies Showing Link Between Vaccines And Autism…
* If Dr. Maurice Hillerman, Former Head Of Vaccines at Merck states; “ALL VACCINES ARE CONTAMINATED, EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM!”…
* If Dr. Robert Bell (former Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital), states that; “The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination”…
* If other Countries like Japan, Norway and Italy are Banning Dangerous Vaccines…
* If it’s a ‘Known Documented Fact’ that 50 million Americans died from the 1918 Flu Vaccine…

…Then the time for ‘Just Talking’ about it, is past. If there is overwhelming evidence of the ‘Harmful Effects’ of Vaccines, then how can the CDC say vaccines are safe?!

It’s time for every American to E-mail their Congressional Representatives with the above information and ask for Congressional Hearings. They may surprise you with their willingness to pursue this matter.

It’s also time for a “Class Action Law Suit”, not against the Vaccine Makers, (that comes later), but against the CDC (Center For Disease Control) itself.


Ignore anything the Media has to say on this subject. It’s time to By-Pass the Media. It’s between US and our Congress. The MSM Mainstream Media can ‘GTH!


April 4, 2013

From 1 in 10,000 children with autism to 1 in 88: Can We Trust the CDC Claim that There is No Link Between Vaccines and Autism?

Health Impact News Editor Comments:

The CDC released a “new” study on “Good Friday” just before the Easter holiday weekend that supposedly showed there was no connection between vaccines and autism. One has to wonder on the timing of the announcement of this study, considering the fact that the CDC just released statistics about two weeks ago stating that the rate of autism among school children in the U.S. has now risen to one out of 50.

So I contacted Dr. Brian Hooker and asked him to respond to this “new” study that the mainstream media is reporting has ended the vaccine-autism debate. According to Dr. Hooker, the study is not so new, as it is based on data from 2010 and is basically a rehash of a “fraudulent” study published then.

Why did we ask Dr. Hooker to comment? There are probably very few people in the world who have spent as much time looking at CDC studies related to vaccines and autism as Dr. Hooker. Dr. Brian Hooker, a PhD scientist, has been fighting the CDC since 2004 in trying to get them to comply with Freedom of Information Acts to see the CDC research that supposedly shows there is no link between mercury in vaccines and autism. The CDC apparently believes they are above the law regarding the Freedom of Information Act, and have fought to withhold most of the information Dr. Hooker has requested. But as you will see from Dr. Hooker’s critique below, even what the CDC does publish and make public doesn’t amount to much of anything that will help us understand the problem of the rising rates of autism, let alone solve it.

Here are Dr. Hooker’s comments on the CDC study just published in The Journal of Pediatrics.
Critique of Destefano et al. 2013 J Peds. Study

By Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D., P.E.

The recent CDC study “Increasing Exposure to Antibody-Stimulating Proteins and Polysaccharides in Vaccines Is Not Associated with Risk of Autism” by Destefano et al. 2013 was released in the Journal of Pediatrics last week. This study purports that “increasing exposure to antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in vaccines during the first 2 years of life was not related to the risk of developing an ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder).” Of all of the papers I have reviewed over my 26-year career as a research scientist, this is perhaps the most flawed and disingenuous study I have encountered. The Destefano et al. 2013 study is to science what the movie Ishtar was to cinema.
No New Data

The basis for the study is essentially a rehash of the data that was used to generate the fraudulent Price et al. 2010 Pediatrics study (Price et al. 2010 “Prenatal and Infant Exposure to Thimerosal From Vaccines and Immunoglobulins and Risk of Autism” Pediatrics 126:656) that was supposed to be the CDC’s “final word” stating that thimerosal, the mercury-containing preservative in some vaccines, was in no way causally linked to autism. Not only was this original study fatally flawed due to a statistical error called “overmatching” (which I’ll discuss further below) but also the study authors hid data regarding the only valid part of the study (i.e., prenatal thimerosal exposure) which showed that children exposed to just 16 microgram mercury in thimerosal in utero were up to 8 times more likely to receive a diagnosis of regressive autism (Price C, et al. Thimerosal and Autism. Technical report. Vol I. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc; 2009). The study authors instead falsely reported no risk of autism associated with prenatal thimerosal exposure.


No True Controls in the Study

Within the Destefano study released last week, with the help of multimillionaire vaccine industrialist Dr. Paul Offit, CDC researchers merely added up the number of vaccine antigens that the case (autism) and control (neurotypical) children were exposed to through the infant vaccination schedule. The theory that they were trying to refute essentially was “children exposed to a greater total number of antigens had a greater risk of autism.” Given this train wreck of a study, it is very difficult to know where to start my critique. However, the following statement stood out from the rest as the study authors described the control group:

Of the remaining 752 controls included in the analysis, 186 had an SCQ (Social Communication Questionaire) score <16 but had indications of speech delay or language delay, learning disability, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or attention deficit disorder, or tics, or had an individual education plan. This clearly shows that the 186 aforementioned controls (25% of the control group) were not controls at all but instead had some underlying developmental deficit (all of which are features of autism or autism spectrum disorder). Unlike the study design described (i.e., where autism cases were matched to neurotypical controls), autism cases were matched with “cases” of other, similar neurodevelopmental maladies. Thus, you would expect to see no difference between the two groups. * Antigen Correlation is Meaningless Next, the basis of the study was to confirm or deny a correlation between the “number of antigens received” and the incidence of autism. The possible number of antigens per given vaccine was reported in Table 1 of the study. However, the term “number of antigens” is a complete white-wash of what is actually in these vaccines, their concentrations and their relative strengths in terms of inflammatory response, and is not an accurate predictor of how the body will respond to specific antigens. For example, “antigens” for the five antigen DTaP vaccines (e.g., Infanrix) include diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin and pertactin. The number “5” assigned in this category is merely the number of different antigens and doesn’t account for each antigen’s amount or relative strength. Neither does this account for the fact that Infanrix also contains aluminum (an adjuvant – designed to elicit a non-specific immune response), formaldehyde and polysorbate 80, all which could also elicit some form of inflammatory reaction. Thus, the main “independent” variable of “number of antigens” within the Destefano et al. 2013 study is essentially completely meaningless. * High Participant Refusal Rate Creates Selection Bias The high participant refusal rate in this study is also problematic. Out of 668 cases and 2444 controls originally selected for the study, only 321 cases (48.1%) and 774 controls (31.7%) chose to participate in the research. In other words, 65% of the individuals contacted as potential participants flat-out refused to participate in the study. Who could blame them?! The CDC has been producing junk science regarding vaccines and autism since 2002 and the public knows. This indeed could produce selection bias in that the 35% of individuals that did participate were less likely to believe that vaccines were responsible for neurodevelopmental sequelae including autism. * Overmatching Statistical Error Also, the analysis is plagued with a statistical error called “overmatching.” For a comprehensive analysis of the previous CDC study completed on the same data set (Price et al. 2010 Pediatrics), regarding thimerosal exposure rather than the number of vaccine antigens, please see Chapter 6, “Vaccine Safety Study as an Interesting Case of ‘Over-Matching’” by M. Catherine DeSoto and Robert Hitlan (http://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-advances-in-autism-spectrum-disorders-volume-i/vaccine-safety-study-as-an-interesting-case-of-over-matching-) in the book “Recent Advances in Autism Spectrum Disorders – Volume I”, edited by Michael Fitzgerald, ISBN 978-953-51-1021-7. The point made by Dr. DeSoto and Dr. Hitlan is that the cases and the controls in this study are too closely matched to each other. Cases were matched with controls of the same age, sex, within the same HMO and essentially the same vaccination schedule using the same vaccine manufacturers. This may be seen in Figures 1 and 2 of the Destefano et al. 2013 paper which indicated that there are almost no differences between the exposure to antigens between the case (autism) and control groups in every exposure group tested. This holds for cumulative antigen levels (Figure 1) as well as single day antigen exposure levels (Figure 2). This type of error of course precludes “finding a difference” between cases and controls because all differences were matched out case-by-case. This would be akin to analyzing radiation workers that got the same dosage of gamma radiation within cases and control groups to determine the relationship between gamma radiation and cancer incidence. Of course, since cases and controls got the same dosage, no effect would be seen. However, this is an unfair study. To see the true effect, cases would need to be matched with controls with variable levels of gamma radiation exposure and perhaps a “no exposure” group would be included as a baseline comparison to cancer rates within higher exposure groups. In the same way, the CDC has used these overmatched data to obfuscate any true effect between vaccine antigen exposure and autism incidence. * Has-the-CDC-done-a-study-on-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-children-226x300(2)

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children Not Studied

Has the CDC done a study on vaccinated vs unvaccinated children 226×300 Can We Trust the CDC Claim that There is No Link Between Vaccines and Autism?

This points back to the study that the CDC refuses to do: Health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. What is the CDC’s point?

Ethics – i.e., we don’t believe that is ethical NOT to vaccination children?… Nonsense – there are portions of the United States’ population that choose not to vaccinate regardless of what CDC believes; Lack of “blinding” within the study design?… again, Nonsense – all current vaccine safety studies are retrospective anyway without any type of blinding to the subjects.

The CDC is simply afraid of what they already know – vaccines cause chronic disease and an unvaccinated population will be much healthier, period (as evidenced in the Glanz et al. 2013 study within the Journal of the American Medical Association which stated that unvaccinated children were seen at a lower rate of frequency in emergency room and outpatient visits).

(Editor’s note: See our commentary on the JAMA study here: JAMA Study: Kids With Fewer Vaccines Have Fewer Doctor and Emergency Room Visits)

Autism Variances from Neurotypical Children Not Studied

Finally, this type of study misses the point entirely that children with autism are physiologically different than neurotypical children. Numerous studies have shown genetic (e.g., James et al. 2006), morphological (e.g., Herbert et al. 2005) and biochemical differences (e.g., Waly et al. 2004) between these two populations. To perform a case-control study such as that presented in the Destefano et al. 2013 paper assumes a genetically, morphologically and physiologically homogeneous population, which is simply not the case.

No one is claiming that children with autism or ASD got higher doses of vaccine antigens, thimerosal, MMR or whatever. What we know instead is that when our children received the same vaccines within the ACIP recommended schedule, they reacted differently. The scientists at the CDC are trained in managing infectious diseases with progressions that may be predicted with reasonable certainty. However, these neurological sequelae to vaccines are chronic, multifactorial conditions that cannot be put into the same tiny box as the common cold, influenza or chicken pox.

The CDC Has Conflicts in Interest Regarding Vaccines

It also needs to be pointed out the CDC is responsible for vaccine uptake in the United States. By their own standards, they believe that vaccine compliance should be at 90% for “herd immunity” to prevent infectious disease outbreaks.

Without going into the flawed logic behind this assertion, my point is that the CDC (and the DHHS as a whole) should not be conducting ANY type of vaccine safety study, based on their primary mandate of maximizing vaccine uptake. Their role is conflicted at best.

This has led to a long list of studies on vaccines and neurological disorders in children that are at a minimum fatally flawed but more often complete misrepresentations of the truth. Starting in 1999, when the CDC buried strong associations between thimerosal exposure early in life (0 to 1 month), where infants exposed to the highest levels of thimerosal possible were at least 7.6 times more likely to receive an autism diagnosis through this current study, there has been developed a full body of “tobacco science” designed to hide the truth of what has been found behind closed doors.

It is time for the CDC to come clean. Their own data show that vaccines cause neurodevelopmental disorders in children including autism.



About the Author

headshot Brian Hooker 150×150 Can We Trust the CDC Claim that There is No Link Between Vaccines and Autism?
Brian S. Hooker, PhD, PE, is an Associate Professor of Biology at Simpson University in Redding California where he specializes in chemistry and biology. Additionally, Hooker is the Senior Process Consultant at ARES Corporation, working closely on process design for the environment restoration industry.

His design efforts focus on industrial biotechnology and chemical engineering principles. Brian dedicated over 15 years as a bioengineer and the team leader for the High Throughput Biology Team and Operations Manager of the DOE Genomics: Genomes to Life (GTL) Center for Molecular and Cellular Systems at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).

Dr. Hooker managed applied plant and fungal molecular biology research projects at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, where systems biology researchers are focused on understanding gene and protein networks involved in individual cell signaling, communication between cells in communities, and cellular metabolic pathways.

In 1985, Dr. Hooker earned his Bachelor of Science degree in chemical engineering, from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California. He earned his Masters of Science degree in 1988 and his doctorate in 1990, both in biochemical engineering, from Washington State University, in Pullman,

Brian Hooker has many accomplishments to his credit including: co-inventor for five patents, recipient of the Battelle Entrepreneurial Award in 2001, and a Federal Laboratory Consortium Recognition Award in 1999, for his work on “Reactive Transport in 3-Dimensions.” The breadth of Hooker’s 50 science and engineering papers have been published in internationally recognized, peer reviewed journals. He has a 15-year old son with autism and has been active in the autism community since 2004.

Contact Dr. Hooker via Health Impact News here.

Copyright 2013 Health Impact News. Health Impact News and Dr. Brian Hooker grant full permission to republish this article. Citiation for original source is appreciated.

U.S. GOVERNMENT ADMITS ‘SAFE VACCINES’ KILL 2,699 U.S. CHILDREN A YEAR!: “Selling Sickness” The Hoax Of modern Medicine: 7 Facts You Need To Know

“Safe” childhood vaccines killed or injured 2,699 children last year in America, the US government has admitted this week – and 101 children developed autism after vaccination, even though researchers continue to insist that no link exists. Parents received $110m in damages.

The news comes at a time when the Japanese government halted its own vaccine programme after six children died following Hib (meningitis) and pneumococcal inoculations.

The extent of the damage caused by the 30 vaccines given to babies and toddlers has been revealed by the US Health Department’s National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which has just released its figures for 2010.

During the year, the Program received submissions from 13,797 families who believed that a vaccine injured or killed their child; although most of the cases are still under review, 2,699 parents have so far been compensated and a link to a vaccine has been established. The most dangerous of the vaccines is the DTP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis), which was the subject of 3,979 claims, including 696 deaths.

And, despite the best efforts of researchers and doctors to disprove any link, the Program has accepted that 101 children’s autism was a direct result of a vaccine. In the past 23 years, the Program has recognised that 2,561 autism cases have been caused by vaccination.

SSource: WDDTY

Written by Administrator Friday, 22 April 2011 [Wellness Uncovered.com]

The Hoax Of modern Medicine: 7 Facts You Need To Know

This accessible study about the collusion between medical science and the drug industry emphasizes how drug companies market their products by either redefining problems as diseases (like female sexual dysfunction) or redefining a condition to encompass a greater percentage of the population. Moynihan, a health journalist for the New England Journal of Medicine and the Lancet, and Cassels, a Canadian science writer, note, for instance, that eight of the nine specialists who wrote the 2004 federal guideline on high cholesterol, which substantially increased the number of people in that category, have multiple financial ties to drug manufacturers. Physicians now routinely prescribe cholesterol-lowering pills (statins) that may have perilous side effects, when many people could lower their risk of heart attack with less costly and dangerous steps, such as exercise and improved diet. Through aggressive merchandising, funding of medical conferences and expensive perks, drug companies win doctors over to diagnosing these “diseases” and prescribing drugs for them.

Science and medicine writers Moynihan and Cassels conjecture that most Americans believe, based on information gleaned from a deluge of pharmaceutical-company advertisements, that conditions such as hypertension, high cholesterol, menopause, and chronic constipation are bona fide diseases. They quote reputable medical experts, however, who refute such understandings. What’s more, they suggest that billions of precious and diminishing health-care dollars are squandered treating those nondiseases of healthy, wealthy Americans and would be better spent treating the legitimately sick poor and fighting the international AIDS epidemic. Quoting former Merck CEO Henry Gadsen–who, in a 1976 Fortune article, confessed that “it had long been his dream to make drugs for healthy people. Because then, Merck would be able to ‘sell to everyone'”–they lay the blame for the misdirected billions at the feet of just such pharmaceutical giants as Merck. Finally, they counterpoint glossy pharmaceutical ad campaigns with alternatives that consumers may consider before asking their doctors for prescription drugs they saw touted on TV. Donna Chavez