December 15, 2017

IT RUNS ON WATER: STAN MEYERS SECRET WATER HYDROGEN FUEL CELL EXPLAINED

It Runs on Water – New Energy – Stan Meyers
Stan Meyers developed a water splitter device that could be used on cars. By replacing the spark plug in your engine with a device that attached his water splitter you would be able to run any existing combustion engine on nothing more that water.
To find out more about this follow the links below

http://www.waterfuelcell.org/

http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html

Stan Meyers Water Car

Stan Meyers Dune Buggy that ran on water. Hydrogen/Oxygen fuel in an ICE motor. On board electrolysis, no hydrogen tanks, no bombs on-board, just water. (1998) It ran 100 miles per gallon! The 2nd best inventor of the Century, besides Tesla, who was and will always be #1. Stan is the mustard seed of Water Powered Cars! The video left above is a one timed aired news cast, from his home town of Grove City , Ohio that you are not to view. The video screen to the right is a segment of the Equinox program about Stanley aired back in Dec. 1995 (approx.) See the entire program entitled “It Runs on Water” narrated by Arthur C. Clarke in video clips below.

SECRETS OF STANLEY MEYER’S WFC – Lecture 1

Water Fuel Cell Lecture Part 1: Stan Meyers


Original Meyer Water Fuel Cell c.1990
Stan Meyer with the original Water Fuel Cell, which he successfully demonstrated to the USPTO, in his Sec. 101 hearing, which resulted in the issuance of U.S. Patent 4,936,961, a fundamental “Methods” patent on the process. This patent, along with another on the device architecture, both expire on June 26th of 2007. As a result, this technology falls into the public domain, forever.

The WFC WATER FUEL CELL: Has recently been successfully replicated by Lawton in the UK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md8-wvV2jHM

RE-POST:[ Water Powered Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Stan Meyers – The Full Story ]

ANTI VACCINE – VACCINES?: Former Merck Scientists File Suit against Merck Under the False Claims Act “wholesale fabrication of test data to reach its preordained 95% efficacy threshold,”

Vaccines are a Poisonous Cocktail and Contain:

Mercury, Aluminum Phosphate, Formaldehyde, Human Fetal Tissue, Aspartame, Squalene,

Monkey Kidney and Lung Cells, Bovine Fetal Serum, MSG, Live Cancer Viruses.

Note: These are only a few of the poisonous toxins in Vaccines – a full list of tables coming soon.

Dr. James Howenstines research states that the Symptoms of Vaccination Poisoning include:

Mercury – a neurotoxin that kills brain cells and creates Severe Nervous System Damage

Vaccine Injections can be instantly followed by Autism (1:100)

Up to 60 % of a Child’s Immune System may be permanently destroyed by multiple vaccines

Sudden Infant Death syndrome (SIDS) (1:500)

Aluminum and Mercury – (The Deadliest combination) – Catalyst for major Neurological Disease

Severe damage to the Central Nervous System causing Guillain-Barré Syndrome (Paralysis)

Auto-immune diseases (Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, Multiple Sclerosis, Asthma) in children

Children suffer learning disabilities, Attention Deficit Disorder (1:10) and Developmental Damage

Normal Liver Function destroyed by Aluminum

Vaccinating immature immune systems causes the development of lifelong Allergies and Asthma

Toxic bacteria, Neurological metal & Living Viruses create Destruction of Developing Brain Cells

Seizures – Dementia – Memory loss – Listlessness – Severe trembling – Synergistic Toxicity

Organ damage – Epilepsy – Blindness – Deafness – Leukemia – Cancer – Death

More: [ VACCINE DANGERS: Vaccine Created Disease ]

Merck-y Details: Former Merck Scientists File Suit against Merck Under the False Claims Act

By Hilary Butler

On April 27, 2012, a formal complaint was filed in the Eastern Pennsylvania Federal District Court accusing Merck of a longstanding scheme to mislead and defraud Government health authorities worldwide. Two of Merck’s former employees have accused the pharmaceutical giant of marketing multivalent MMR vaccines under false pretenses. According to the complaint, these vaccines have been mislabeled, misbranded, adulterated and falsely certified as having a 95% efficacy rate.

Before the lawsuit was filed, 21 doctors1 added their voices to other groups of doctors who are calling for MMR vaccines to be used as a regular booster every 4 – 8 years, in order to control mumps outbreaks. These doctors all assume that the mumps component of all MMR vaccines have the 95 – 98% efficacy promised by Merck.

However, the court documents filed by two Merck virologists meticulously detail how Merck ostensibly manipulated test results2 for decades in order to create a false 95% efficacy rate for the mumps component of their multivalent MMR vaccines.

The former Merck virologists contend that the multivalent mumps component has a vastly reduced efficacy which is directly responsible for mumps outbreaks during the last decade which prompted international calls for MMR booster shots every 4 – 8 years.

Virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski describe how Merck had to recertify the mumps component in 2000, in order to comply with regulatory requirements in order for the mumps component to be included in two new multivalent MMR vaccines. The usual test, which had certified the mumps component’s efficacy in the 60’s, failed when used in 2000. They claim the results were so low Merck decided to change its own test protocol by testing the vaccine against the weakened mumps vaccine virus instead of the wild (naturally circulating) mumps virus.

When that modification didn’t result in the desired 95% efficacy figure, Merck’s executive directors of vaccine research, Drs Alan Shaw and Emilio Emini, instructed Drs David Krah and Mary Yagodich to implement a vast array of modifications to testing procedures,3 then, allegedly pressured both Krahling and Wlochowski to participate.

When these modifications also failed to demonstrate the desired 95% efficacy rate, it is alleged that Drs Shaw and Emini instructed Drs Krah and Yagovich to abandon “gold standard” testing, and implement a new procedure, supposedly with the agreement of FDA, which included adding animal antibodies to human blood samples taken both pre and post vaccination.4

By combining the very low levels of human antibodies with animal antibodies, a much higher total level of virus neutralization was obtained than could occur from human antibodies alone. The human antibody levels alone would never protect in the real world against wild mumps. But after adding animal antibodies, the human blood samples which had previously failed under the old “gold standard” testing were retested using the “enhanced” protocols and passed with flying colors. New ‘enhanced’ tests showed 100% efficacy, not against wild mumps virus, but against the mumps vaccine virus.

However, combining the animal and human antibodies led to a new problem. In some of the tests more than 80% of pre-vaccine blood samples now showed up as immune. Usually, the highest number of pre-vaccine immune results any scientist could expect is 10%. Further manipulations of the animal antibody levels failed to bring the pre-vaccine blood test results down to the expected 10% levels.

According to the complaint, Merck then implemented additional ‘creative’ strategies to show a lack of seroconversion in immune samples in an attempt to reduce the pre-vax level to the expected 10% because had the FDA seen the high numbers of “immune” pre-vaccine samples they would have easily detected the fraudulent test procedures.

Krahling and Wlochowski worked with the same team conducting these tests, but were outraged at what they deemed to be gross scientific deception and fraudulent practices.

When Drs Krahling and Wlochowski attempted to stop what they saw as, “wholesale fabrication of test data to reach its preordained 95% efficacy threshold,” Merck allegedly made various attempts to prevent them, including threatening to jail Dr. Krahling should he inform the FDA.

Despite these efforts, Dr Krahling made numerous calls to FDA. These calls remained unanswered until Dr. Krahling reported to the FDA that Dr. Krah had removed and/or destroyed Dr. Krahling’s evidence.

An FDA agent then came and interviewed Dr. Krah, who apparently told the agent whatever was necessary to allay their concerns. The agent made no attempt5 to interview any other personnel, check any facilities, laboratory notebooks, or samples to corroborate what had been reported to them.

The lawsuit claims that to this day, Merck has consistently misrepresented the potency by simply quoting the 40 year old data from the pre-MMR monovalent mumps vaccine, thereby misrepresenting the efficacy of four multivalent vaccines: MMR, MMRII, Europe’s MMRvaxpro, and ProQuad, which is MMR plus chickenpox.

According to the two whistleblowers, not only have all the multivalent MMR vaccines been sold under false pretenses, but, as a result of this LACK OF EFFICACY, there have been numerous mumps outbreaks worldwide prompting calls for regular MMR boosters throughout life. These mumps outbreaks were predicted by Merck’s Dr Krah6 in 2001, yet Merck allegedly ‘willfully’ withheld this information from multiple governments7 while consistently claiming there was no need for a new mumps component.8

The question is, “If the mumps component is actually 95% effective, as stated, would experts be calling for lifelong boosters every 4 – 8 years?”

Has Merck turned over a new leaf since the recent Vioxx Scandal? Do they still put profit before people? Read the complaint, follow the court case, examine the evidence, and decide for yourself.

References:

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8607503
Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act
See pgs 10 and 11 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act
See page 12 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act
See page 22 No. 64 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act
See page27/d82; 28/85 and page 40 first two lines – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act
See page 29/86 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act
See page 29/87 – Former Merck Virologists: suit against Merck under False Claims Act
Related articles

Gary Null & Nancy Ashley – GOV. NIKKI HALEY REJECTS GARDASIL: A MOMENT OF SANITY IN A SEA OF CORPORATE-SPONSORED CONFUSION (prn.fm)
Merck & Co., Inc. Recalls Vaccine After Accidental Release: FDA (biospace.com)

Read more: http://prn.fm/2012/06/26/merck-y-details-merck-scientists-file-suit-merck-false-claims-act/#ixzz24a4R143n
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution